Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMECX vs RNWHX
EMECX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EMECX vs RNWHX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity C
Price$11.92
Change+$0.09 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets187.61M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$88.56
Change+$0.54 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.12B
EMECX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMECX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMECX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 70.1B vs. EMECX (188M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than EMECX: RNWHX (0.99) vs EMECX (0.26). EMECX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EMECX (13 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). EMECX (2.48) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EMECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMECX: RNWHX (250) vs EMECX (1000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.66 vs. EMECX (9.85). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 32.51 vs. EMECX (8.67).
| EMECX | RNWHX | EMECX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 0.72 | 285% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.48 | 0.72 | 344% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.227 | 16.496 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 188M | 70.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 0.99 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.85 | 11.66 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.17 | 40.00 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.67 | 32.51 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.98 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement