Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMECX vs RNWHX
EMECX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EMECX vs RNWHX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity C
Price$13.12
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.08M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$94.22
Change-$0.11 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.13B
EMECX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMECX vs. RNWHX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMECX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. EMECX (237M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than EMECX: RNWHX (0.90) vs EMECX (0.22). EMECX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EMECX (13 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). EMECX (2.48) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EMECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMECX: RNWHX (250) vs EMECX (1000). EMECX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.10 vs. RNWHX (19.11). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 20.32 vs. EMECX (-2.22).
| EMECX | RNWHX | EMECX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 0.72 | 285% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.48 | 0.72 | 344% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.890 | 23.941 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 237M | 74.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.90 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.10 | 19.11 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.90 | 45.92 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.22 | 20.32 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.45 | 88.47 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement