Ad is loading...
EMFIX vs RNWAX
EMFIX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts EMFIX vs RNWAX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Instl
Price$10.35
Change-$0.19 (-1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets157.94M
American Funds New World R1
Price$71.95
Change-$0.80 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.23B
EMFIX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMFIX vs. RNWAX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMFIX is a StrongBuy and RNWAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 60.2B vs. EMFIX (158M). EMFIX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: EMFIX (0.60) vs RNWAX (0.00). EMFIX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: EMFIX (14 years) vs RNWAX (23 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than EMFIX (1.39). EMFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. RNWAX (37.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMFIX: RNWAX (250) vs EMFIX (1000000). EMFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.77 vs. RNWAX (-1.22). RNWAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.09 vs. EMFIX (17.90).
| EMFIX | RNWAX | EMFIX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.66 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.66 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.771 | -2.282 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158M | 60.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.77 | -1.22 | -390% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.90 | 1.72 | 400% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.90 | 27.09 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.39 | 31.89 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...