Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMFIX vs RNWBX
EMFIX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMFIX vs RNWBX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Instl
Price$12.87
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets215.23M
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.70
Change+$0.31 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.77B
EMFIX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMFIX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMFIX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. EMFIX (215M). EMFIX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMFIX (0.82) vs RNWBX (0.13). EMFIX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMFIX (14 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than EMFIX (1.49). EMFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMFIX: RNWBX (250) vs EMFIX (1000000). EMFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.34 vs. RNWBX (11.99). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 18.24 vs. EMFIX (7.26).
| EMFIX | RNWBX | EMFIX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.67 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.67 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.492 | 17.879 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 215M | 71.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.13 | 635% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.34 | 11.99 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.37 | 36.12 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.26 | 18.24 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.62 | 81.10 | 147% |