Ad is loading...
EMFIX vs RNWHX
EMFIX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EMFIX vs RNWHX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Instl
Price$10.35
Change-$0.19 (-1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets157.94M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$74.49
Change-$0.82 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.23B
EMFIX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMFIX vs. RNWHX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMFIX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 60.2B vs. EMFIX (158M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than EMFIX: RNWHX (1.12) vs EMFIX (0.60). EMFIX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EMFIX (14 years) vs RNWHX (9 years). EMFIX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EMFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMFIX: RNWHX (250) vs EMFIX (1000000). EMFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.77 vs. RNWHX (-0.21). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 32.05 vs. EMFIX (17.90).
| EMFIX | RNWHX | EMFIX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.72 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.72 | 193% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.771 | -2.013 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158M | 60.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.12 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.77 | -0.21 | -2,285% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.90 | 3.82 | 180% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.90 | 32.05 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...