Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMFIX vs RNWHX
EMFIX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EMFIX vs RNWHX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Instl
Price$11.96
Change+$0.06 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets177.56M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$85.04
Change+$0.19 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.63B
EMFIX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMFIX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMFIX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 67.6B vs. EMFIX (178M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than EMFIX: RNWHX (1.04) vs EMFIX (0.56). EMFIX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EMFIX (14 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). EMFIX (1.49) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EMFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMFIX: RNWHX (250) vs EMFIX (1000000). EMFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.33 vs. RNWHX (7.68). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 30.14 vs. EMFIX (15.67).
| EMFIX | RNWHX | EMFIX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.72 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 0.72 | 207% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.904 | 11.865 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 178M | 67.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 1.04 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.33 | 7.68 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.72 | 23.56 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.67 | 30.14 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.94 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers