Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMFIX vs RNWHX
EMFIX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EMFIX vs RNWHX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Instl
Price$13.67
Change-$0.06 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets229.96M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$94.55
Change-$0.09 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.73B
EMFIX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMFIX vs. RNWHX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMFIX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 74.7B vs. EMFIX (230M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than EMFIX: RNWHX (0.93) vs EMFIX (0.79). EMFIX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EMFIX (14 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). EMFIX (1.49) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EMFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMFIX: RNWHX (250) vs EMFIX (1000000). EMFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.46 vs. RNWHX (15.49). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 29.20 vs. EMFIX (12.67).
| EMFIX | RNWHX | EMFIX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.72 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 0.72 | 207% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.555 | 24.494 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 230M | 74.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.93 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.46 | 15.49 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.97 | 57.44 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.67 | 29.20 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers