Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMGAX vs RNWBX
EMGAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMGAX vs RNWBX
Allspring Emerging Markets Equity A
Price$30.57
Change-$0.11 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.48B
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.39
Change-$0.04 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.77B
EMGAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMGAX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMGAX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. EMGAX (3.48B). EMGAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMGAX (0.89) vs RNWBX (0.13). EMGAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMGAX (31 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than EMGAX (1.52). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. EMGAX (10.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMGAX: RNWBX (250) vs EMGAX (1000). EMGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.07 vs. RNWBX (10.83). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 17.82 vs. EMGAX (11.75).
| EMGAX | RNWBX | EMGAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.67 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.67 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.213 | 17.458 | 133% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.48B | 71.8B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 0.13 | 688% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.07 | 10.83 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.90 | 34.80 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.75 | 17.82 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.30 | 79.12 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers