Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMGAX vs RNWBX
EMGAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMGAX vs RNWBX
Allspring Emerging Markets Equity A
Price$32.57
Change+$0.37 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.61B
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.18
Change+$0.57 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.08B
EMGAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMGAX vs. RNWBX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMGAX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. EMGAX (3.61B). EMGAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMGAX (0.87) vs RNWBX (0.13). EMGAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMGAX (31 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than EMGAX (1.52). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. EMGAX (10.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMGAX: RNWBX (250) vs EMGAX (1000). EMGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.56 vs. RNWBX (16.11). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 25.99 vs. EMGAX (19.24).
| EMGAX | RNWBX | EMGAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.67 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.67 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.317 | 22.610 | 130% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.61B | 74.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 0.13 | 693% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.56 | 16.11 | 165% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.48 | 46.85 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.24 | 25.99 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.18 | 89.59 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement