Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMGCX vs RNWBX
EMGCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMGCX vs RNWBX
Allspring Emerging Markets Equity C
Price$25.43
Change-$0.03 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.48B
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.59
Change+$0.19 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.41B
EMGCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMGCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMGCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.4B vs. EMGCX (3.48B). EMGCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMGCX (0.27) vs RNWBX (0.13). EMGCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMGCX (31 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). EMGCX (2.27) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. EMGCX (10.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMGCX: RNWBX (250) vs EMGCX (1000). EMGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.67 vs. RNWBX (12.87). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 22.93 vs. EMGCX (11.40).
| EMGCX | RNWBX | EMGCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.18 | 1.67 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.27 | 1.67 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.910 | 17.729 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.48B | 71.4B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 0.13 | 207% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.67 | 12.87 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.16 | 30.09 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.40 | 22.93 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.28 | 72.17 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers