Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMGCX vs RNWBX
EMGCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMGCX vs RNWBX
Allspring Emerging Markets Equity C
Price$27.48
Change-$0.11 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.7B
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.50
Change-$0.93 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.89B
EMGCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMGCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMGCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.9B vs. EMGCX (3.7B). EMGCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMGCX (0.23) vs RNWBX (0.12). EMGCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMGCX (31 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). EMGCX (2.27) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. EMGCX (10.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMGCX: RNWBX (250) vs EMGCX (1000). EMGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.21 vs. RNWBX (18.50). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 16.42 vs. EMGCX (8.79).
| EMGCX | RNWBX | EMGCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.18 | 1.67 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.27 | 1.67 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.818 | 23.046 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.7B | 74.9B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.12 | 199% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.21 | 18.50 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.13 | 43.20 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.79 | 16.42 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.94 | 82.43 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement