Ad is loading...
EMGCX vs RNWFX
EMGCX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts EMGCX vs RNWFX
Allspring Emerging Markets Equity C
Price$22.42
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.46B
American Funds New World R5
Price$81.76
Change+$0.18 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.55B
EMGCX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMGCX vs. RNWFX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMGCX is a StrongBuy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 63.6B vs. EMGCX (3.46B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than EMGCX: RNWFX (1.15) vs EMGCX (0.30). EMGCX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: EMGCX (31 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). EMGCX (2.27) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. EMGCX (10.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMGCX: RNWFX (250) vs EMGCX (1000). EMGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.31 vs. RNWFX (3.15). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.83 vs. EMGCX (19.38).
| EMGCX | RNWFX | EMGCX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.18 | 0.62 | 352% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.27 | 0.62 | 366% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.652 | 5.592 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.46B | 63.6B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 1.15 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.31 | 3.15 | 264% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.96 | 22.56 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.38 | 37.83 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.62 | 49.87 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers