EMGDF
Price
$0.28
Change
-$0.02 (-6.67%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
10.65M
FLMCF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 27 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMGDF vs FLMCF

Header iconEMGDF vs FLMCF Comparison
Open Charts EMGDF vs FLMCFBanner chart's image
EMINENT GOLD
Price$0.28
Change-$0.02 (-6.67%)
Volume$25.05K
Capitalization10.65M
First Lithium Minerals
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6K
CapitalizationN/A
EMGDF vs FLMCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMGDF vs. FLMCF commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMGDF is a Hold and FLMCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (EMGDF: $0.28 vs. FLMCF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: EMGDF and FLMCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMGDF: 161% vs. FLMCF: 100%
Market capitalization -- EMGDF: $10.65M vs. FLMCF: $0
EMGDF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $10.65M. FLMCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMGDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFLMCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EMGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FLMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EMGDF and FLMCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMGDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • EMGDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

EMGDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +2.63% price change this week, while FLMCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.00%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.75% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLMCF YTD gains are higher at: 27.009 vs. EMGDF (-4.819).
EMGDFFLMCFEMGDF / FLMCF
Capitalization10.6MN/A-
EBITDA-1.29MN/A-
Gain YTD-4.81927.009-18%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash78.2KN/A-
Total Debt150KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMGDFFLMCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PBF23.831.56
+7.00%
PBF Energy
MONDY33.870.53
+1.58%
Mondi Plc.
TASK16.790.06
+0.36%
TaskUs
KLRS2.63-0.04
-1.60%
Kalaris Therapeutics Inc
LINC22.65-0.59
-2.54%
Lincoln Educational Services Corp

EMGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMGDF and FLMCF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMGDF and FLMCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMGDF
1D Price
Change %
EMGDF100%
-8.15%
FLMCF - EMGDF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PXCLF - EMGDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+80.59%
ZZZOF - EMGDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLGGF - EMGDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-6.51%
KLDCF - EMGDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.68%
More

FLMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLMCF and EUEMF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLMCF and EUEMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLMCF
1D Price
Change %
FLMCF100%
N/A
EUEMF - FLMCF
30%
Poorly correlated
+10.38%
JIAXF - FLMCF
27%
Poorly correlated
+10.80%
PXCLF - FLMCF
26%
Poorly correlated
+80.59%
JUBPF - FLMCF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMGDF - FLMCF
24%
Poorly correlated
-8.15%
More