EMGDF
Price
$0.21
Change
-$0.01 (-4.55%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
16.35M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
KLDCF
Price
$1.40
Change
+$0.04 (+2.94%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Capitalization
104.38M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMGDF vs KLDCF

Header iconEMGDF vs KLDCF Comparison
Open Charts EMGDF vs KLDCFBanner chart's image
EMINENT GOLD
Price$0.21
Change-$0.01 (-4.55%)
Volume$50.8K
Capitalization16.35M
Kenorland Minerals
Price$1.40
Change+$0.04 (+2.94%)
Volume$56.45K
Capitalization104.38M
EMGDF vs KLDCF Comparison Chart in %
EMGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KLDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMGDF vs. KLDCF commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMGDF is a Hold and KLDCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (EMGDF: $0.21 vs. KLDCF: $1.34)
Brand notoriety: EMGDF and KLDCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMGDF: 176% vs. KLDCF: 251%
Market capitalization -- EMGDF: $16.35M vs. KLDCF: $104.38M
EMGDF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $16.35M. KLDCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $104.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMGDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKLDCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EMGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KLDCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EMGDF is a better buy in the long-term than KLDCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMGDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KLDCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMGDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KLDCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EMGDF is a better buy in the short-term than KLDCF.

Price Growth

EMGDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -8.70% price change this week, while KLDCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -6.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +253.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.05% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KLDCF($104M) has a higher market cap than EMGDF($16.4M). KLDCF YTD gains are higher at: 53.494 vs. EMGDF (-27.461). EMGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.58M vs. KLDCF (-7.13M). KLDCF has more cash in the bank: 25.8M vs. EMGDF (1.95M). EMGDF has less debt than KLDCF: EMGDF (100K) vs KLDCF (179K). KLDCF has higher revenues than EMGDF: KLDCF (3.02M) vs EMGDF (0).
EMGDFKLDCFEMGDF / KLDCF
Capitalization16.4M104M16%
EBITDA-1.58M-7.13M22%
Gain YTD-27.46153.494-51%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue03.02M-
Total Cash1.95M25.8M8%
Total Debt100K179K56%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMGDFKLDCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KLDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SIRI21.380.06
+0.28%
SiriusXM Holdings Inc
MBIN30.91-0.31
-0.98%
Merchants Bancorp
API3.48-0.04
-1.14%
Agora
LLY802.83-16.55
-2.02%
Eli Lilly & Co
ANVS1.98-0.05
-2.46%
Annovis Bio

EMGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMGDF and FLMCF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMGDF and FLMCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMGDF
1D Price
Change %
EMGDF100%
-3.92%
FLMCF - EMGDF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PXCLF - EMGDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZZZOF - EMGDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLGGF - EMGDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-9.62%
KLDCF - EMGDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.62%
More

KLDCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KLDCF and CVVUF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KLDCF and CVVUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KLDCF
1D Price
Change %
KLDCF100%
+3.03%
CVVUF - KLDCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.65%
BKIRF - KLDCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+23.08%
EMGDF - KLDCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
AABB - KLDCF
14%
Poorly correlated
-2.17%
SLVDF - KLDCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+12.54%
More