EMGDF vs PXCLF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMGDF is a Hold and PXCLF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EMGDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePXCLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- EMGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PXCLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EMGDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PXCLF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EMGDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PXCLF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
EMGDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +17.36% price change this week, while PXCLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -27.27% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.96%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.34% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| EMGDF | PXCLF | EMGDF / PXCLF | |
| Capitalization | 10.6M | 40.2M | 26% |
| EBITDA | -1.29M | -955.9K | 135% |
| Gain YTD | 5.907 | -27.273 | -22% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 78.2K | 13.1M | 1% |
| Total Debt | 150K | 0 | - |
PXCLF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 23 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| EMGDF | PXCLF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | 12 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 83% | 12 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 80% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 78% | 12 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 68% | 12 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 52% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 89% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 88% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 74% | 12 days ago 76% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| STRV | 38.66 | 0.44 | +1.15% |
| Strive 500 ETF | |||
| QTOC | 29.79 | 0.30 | +1.00% |
| Innovator Growth Accelertd Pls ETF™ Oct | |||
| DFAU | 41.42 | 0.36 | +0.88% |
| Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF | |||
| XSHD | 14.81 | 0.07 | +0.48% |
| Invesco S&P SmallCap Hi Div Low Vol ETF | |||
| GBF | 102.19 | 0.04 | +0.04% |
| iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF | |||
EMGDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EMGDF and FLMCF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMGDF and FLMCF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMGDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMGDF | 100% | +4.46% | ||
| FLMCF - EMGDF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PXCLF - EMGDF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ZZZOF - EMGDF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SLGGF - EMGDF | 23% Poorly correlated | -3.26% | ||
| KLDCF - EMGDF | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.82% | ||
More | ||||
PXCLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PXCLF and JUBPF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PXCLF and JUBPF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PXCLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PXCLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| JUBPF - PXCLF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FLMCF - PXCLF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SRUUF - PXCLF | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.46% | ||
| EMGDF - PXCLF | 24% Poorly correlated | +4.46% | ||
| BMTLF - PXCLF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||