Ad is loading...
EMGDF
Price
$0.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 8 closing price
ZZZOF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

EMGDF vs ZZZOF

Header iconEMGDF vs ZZZOF Comparison
Open Charts EMGDF vs ZZZOFBanner chart's image
EMINENT GOLD
Price$0.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
Zinc One Resources
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$470
CapitalizationN/A
EMGDF vs ZZZOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMGDF vs. ZZZOF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMGDF is a Hold and ZZZOF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (EMGDF: $0.25 vs. ZZZOF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: EMGDF and ZZZOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMGDF: 9% vs. ZZZOF: 407%
Market capitalization -- EMGDF: $10.65M vs. ZZZOF: $307.27K
EMGDF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $10.65M. ZZZOF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $307.27K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMGDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZZZOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EMGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZZZOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EMGDF and ZZZOF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

EMGDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ZZZOF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +18.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.39% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMGDF($10.6M) has a higher market cap than ZZZOF($307K). EMGDF YTD gains are higher at: 56.522 vs. ZZZOF (-12.936). ZZZOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -24.73K vs. EMGDF (-1.29M). ZZZOF has more cash in the bank: 156K vs. EMGDF (78.2K). EMGDF has less debt than ZZZOF: EMGDF (150K) vs ZZZOF (390K). EMGDF (0) and ZZZOF (0) have equivalent revenues.
EMGDFZZZOFEMGDF / ZZZOF
Capitalization10.6M307K3,453%
EBITDA-1.29M-24.73K5,214%
Gain YTD56.522-12.936-437%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash78.2K156K50%
Total Debt150K390K38%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ZZZOF: Fundamental Ratings
ZZZOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMNIX29.190.13
+0.45%
Steward Equity Market Neutral I
GSIIX52.08-0.25
-0.48%
Goldman Sachs Equity Income Instl
TMSIX38.82-0.22
-0.56%
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock S
RLBFX36.20-0.33
-0.90%
American Funds American Balanced R5
IAXTX8.85-0.10
-1.12%
VY® T. Rowe Price Divers Mid Cap Gr S2

EMGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMGDF and FLMCF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMGDF and FLMCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMGDF
1D Price
Change %
EMGDF100%
N/A
FLMCF - EMGDF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PXCLF - EMGDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZZZOF - EMGDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLGGF - EMGDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KLDCF - EMGDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
More

ZZZOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZZZOF has been loosely correlated with ANLBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZZZOF jumps, then ANLBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZZZOF
1D Price
Change %
ZZZOF100%
N/A
ANLBF - ZZZOF
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ASHXF - ZZZOF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
EMGDF - ZZZOF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRUCF - ZZZOF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AVPMF - ZZZOF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More