22 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
EMGF vs NOAH
EMGF vs NOAH Comparison
Open Charts EMGF vs NOAH
iShares Em Mkts Eq Fac ETF
Price$47.68
Change-$0.21 (-0.44%)
Volume$38.5K
Net Assets752.81M
Noah Holdings
Price$11.82
Change+$0.04 (+0.34%)
Volume$121.35K
Capitalization1.16B
EMGF vs NOAH Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMGF vs. NOAH commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMGF is a StrongBuy and NOAH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NOAH: Fundamental Ratings
NOAH | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EMGF | NOAH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EMGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMGF has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EMGF jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMGF | 100% | -0.44% | ||
| BABA - EMGF | 71% Closely correlated | +5.72% | ||
| BZ - EMGF | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.30% | ||
| NOAH - EMGF | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| QFIN - EMGF | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.13% | ||
| BEKE - EMGF | 55% Loosely correlated | +3.36% | ||
More | ||||
NOAH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NOAH and NXDT have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NOAH and NXDT's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NOAH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOAH | 100% | +0.34% | ||
| NXDT - NOAH | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.80% | ||
| BUR - NOAH | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.78% | ||
| PSEC - NOAH | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.22% | ||
| NEWT - NOAH | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.71% | ||
| AB - NOAH | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.11% | ||
More | ||||