Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMGNX vs RNWBX
EMGNX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMGNX vs RNWBX
Allspring Emerging Markets Equity Inst
Price$34.38
Change-$0.31 (-0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.68B
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.50
Change-$0.93 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.89B
EMGNX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMGNX vs. RNWBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMGNX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.9B vs. EMGNX (3.68B). EMGNX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMGNX (0.98) vs RNWBX (0.12). EMGNX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMGNX (15 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than EMGNX (1.20). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. EMGNX (10.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMGNX: RNWBX (250) vs EMGNX (1000000). EMGNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.56 vs. RNWBX (18.50). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 16.42 vs. EMGNX (13.03).
| EMGNX | RNWBX | EMGNX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.67 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.67 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.042 | 23.046 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.68B | 74.9B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 0.12 | 838% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.56 | 18.50 | 171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.26 | 43.20 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.03 | 16.42 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.02 | 82.43 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement