Ad is loading...
EMGRX vs FSSNX
EMGRX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts EMGRX vs FSSNX
Nuveen Small Cap Select A
Price$8.96
Change+$0.76 (+9.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets127.25M
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$23.84
Change+$1.90 (+8.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.17B
EMGRX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMGRX vs. FSSNX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMGRX is a Buy and FSSNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. EMGRX (127M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than EMGRX: FSSNX (1.13) vs EMGRX (0.02). EMGRX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: EMGRX (33 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). EMGRX (1.41) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). EMGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMGRX: FSSNX (0) vs EMGRX (3000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.11 vs. EMGRX (-18.80). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 47.63 vs. EMGRX (32.70).
| EMGRX | FSSNX | EMGRX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.03 | 4,960% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 0.03 | 5,640% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -22.053 | -20.737 | 106% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 127M | 24.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 1.13 | 1% |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.80 | -14.11 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.49 | -7.29 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.70 | 47.63 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | -29.62 | 35.88 | -83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers