EMHLF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.01 (-8.33%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
121.16M
MP
Price
$31.84
Change
-$0.53 (-1.64%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.37B
26 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMHLF vs MP

Header iconEMHLF vs MP Comparison
Open Charts EMHLF vs MPBanner chart's image
European Metals Holdings
Price$0.11
Change-$0.01 (-8.33%)
Volume$30.55K
Capitalization121.16M
MP Materials
Price$31.84
Change-$0.53 (-1.64%)
Volume$3.89M
Capitalization2.37B
EMHLF vs MP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMHLF vs. MP commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMHLF is a Hold and MP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (EMHLF: $0.11 vs. MP: $31.84)
Brand notoriety: EMHLF and MP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMHLF: 163% vs. MP: 45%
Market capitalization -- EMHLF: $121.16M vs. MP: $2.37B
EMHLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $121.16M. MP’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMHLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EMHLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MP is a better buy in the long-term than EMHLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMHLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMHLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both EMHLF and MP are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

EMHLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -5.98% price change this week, while MP (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -11.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

MP is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MP($2.37B) has a higher market cap than EMHLF($121M). MP has higher P/E ratio than EMHLF: MP (107.71) vs EMHLF (28.82). MP YTD gains are higher at: 104.103 vs. EMHLF (27.315). MP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 94M vs. EMHLF (-7.27M). MP has more cash in the bank: 998M vs. EMHLF (17.5M). EMHLF has less debt than MP: EMHLF (64K) vs MP (689M). MP has higher revenues than EMHLF: MP (253M) vs EMHLF (1.1M).
EMHLFMPEMHLF / MP
Capitalization121M2.37B5%
EBITDA-7.27M94M-8%
Gain YTD27.315104.10326%
P/E Ratio28.82107.7127%
Revenue1.1M253M0%
Total Cash17.5M998M2%
Total Debt64K689M0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMHLFMP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AFOIX18.430.22
+1.21%
Alger Mid Cap Focus I
VRVIX338.451.89
+0.56%
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value Index I
HEIIX13.430.07
+0.52%
Hennessy Equity and Income Institutional
FIKYX13.710.02
+0.15%
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% Z
NWXPX10.20-0.01
-0.10%
Nationwide International Index Instl Svc

EMHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMHLF and BTRYF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMHLF and BTRYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMHLF
1D Price
Change %
EMHLF100%
-5.01%
BTRYF - EMHLF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YLLXF - EMHLF
5%
Poorly correlated
-3.14%
SMRVF - EMHLF
4%
Poorly correlated
+13.49%
MP - EMHLF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
ASMMF - EMHLF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
More