EMHLF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 16 closing price
Capitalization
121.16M
MP
Price
$20.94
Change
-$0.23 (-1.09%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.37B
31 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EMHLF vs MP

Header iconEMHLF vs MP Comparison
Open Charts EMHLF vs MPBanner chart's image
European Metals Holdings
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$20.3K
Capitalization121.16M
MP Materials
Price$20.94
Change-$0.23 (-1.09%)
Volume$1.98M
Capitalization2.37B
EMHLF vs MP Comparison Chart
Loading...
EMHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMHLF vs. MP commentary
Jan 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMHLF is a Hold and MP is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 20, 2025
Stock price -- (EMHLF: $0.10 vs. MP: $20.94)
Brand notoriety: EMHLF and MP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMHLF: 3% vs. MP: 65%
Market capitalization -- EMHLF: $121.16M vs. MP: $2.37B
EMHLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $121.16M. MP’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMHLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EMHLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MP is a better buy in the long-term than EMHLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMHLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMHLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EMHLF is a better buy in the short-term than MP.

Price Growth

EMHLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +1.06% price change this week, while MP (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +6.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

MP is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.34% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MP($2.37B) has a higher market cap than EMHLF($121M). MP has higher P/E ratio than EMHLF: MP (107.71) vs EMHLF (28.82). MP YTD gains are higher at: 34.231 vs. EMHLF (20.949). MP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 94M vs. EMHLF (-7.27M). MP has more cash in the bank: 998M vs. EMHLF (17.5M). EMHLF has less debt than MP: EMHLF (64K) vs MP (689M). MP has higher revenues than EMHLF: MP (253M) vs EMHLF (1.1M).
EMHLFMPEMHLF / MP
Capitalization121M2.37B5%
EBITDA-7.27M94M-8%
Gain YTD20.94934.23161%
P/E Ratio28.82107.7127%
Revenue1.1M253M0%
Total Cash17.5M998M2%
Total Debt64K689M0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMHLFMP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EMHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RGIYX9.390.06
+0.64%
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure Y
SGENX68.430.39
+0.57%
First Eagle Global A
PIBAX17.520.09
+0.52%
PGIM Balanced A
HUSEX29.690.12
+0.41%
Huber Small Cap Value Instl
JNOSX45.350.05
+0.11%
Janus Henderson Overseas D

EMHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMHLF and BTRYF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMHLF and BTRYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMHLF
1D Price
Change %
EMHLF100%
N/A
BTRYF - EMHLF
14%
Poorly correlated
+7.31%
YLLXF - EMHLF
5%
Poorly correlated
-3.21%
SMRVF - EMHLF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MP - EMHLF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
ASMMF - EMHLF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
More