EMIF vs UGP ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMIF is a Buy and UGP is a Hold.
UGP | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| EMIF | UGP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 7 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 75% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KURE | 14.76 | 0.07 | +0.51% |
| KraneShares MSCI All China Hlth Care ETF | |||
| HYBL | 28.00 | 0.03 | +0.10% |
| SPDR® Blackstone High Income ETF | |||
| EEMV | 56.00 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| iShares MSCI Emerg Mkts Min Vol Fctr ETF | |||
| BZQ | 12.37 | -0.09 | -0.75% |
| ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped | |||
| TPYP | 27.38 | -0.22 | -0.80% |
| Tortoise North American Pipeline | |||
EMIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMIF has been loosely correlated with EBR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMIF jumps, then EBR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMIF | 100% | +0.16% | ||
| EBR - EMIF | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| PAC - EMIF | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| ASR - EMIF | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| ELP - EMIF | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| UGP - EMIF | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
More | ||||
UGP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UGP has been loosely correlated with CSAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UGP jumps, then CSAN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UGP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UGP | 100% | +0.80% | ||
| CSAN - UGP | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| CLNE - UGP | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.43% | ||
| BPT - UGP | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.76% | ||
| CVI - UGP | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.32% | ||
| WKC - UGP | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.55% | ||
More | ||||