EMLAF
Price
$35.84
Change
+$0.15 (+0.42%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
8.22B
LBLCF
Price
$38.57
Change
-$0.19 (-0.49%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
46.33B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMLAF vs LBLCF

Header iconEMLAF vs LBLCF Comparison
Open Charts EMLAF vs LBLCFBanner chart's image
Empire
Price$35.84
Change+$0.15 (+0.42%)
Volume$216
Capitalization8.22B
Loblaw Companies
Price$38.57
Change-$0.19 (-0.49%)
Volume$1.07K
Capitalization46.33B
EMLAF vs LBLCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMLAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LBLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMLAF vs. LBLCF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMLAF is a Hold and LBLCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (EMLAF: $35.84 vs. LBLCF: $38.57)
Brand notoriety: EMLAF and LBLCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMLAF: 9% vs. LBLCF: 6%
Market capitalization -- EMLAF: $8.22B vs. LBLCF: $46.33B
EMLAF [@Food Retail] is valued at $8.22B. LBLCF’s [@Food Retail] market capitalization is $46.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Retail] industry ranges from $46.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Retail] industry is $12.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMLAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLBLCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EMLAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LBLCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LBLCF is a better buy in the long-term than EMLAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMLAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LBLCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMLAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • LBLCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LBLCF is a better buy in the short-term than EMLAF.

Price Growth

EMLAF (@Food Retail) experienced а +0.36% price change this week, while LBLCF (@Food Retail) price change was -2.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Retail industry was -0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.11%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Retail (-0.30% weekly)

The food retail industry includes companies that sell food, beverage and household products. Items sold include grocery, gourmet food, fresh produce, and frozen food. Kroger Co., George Weston Ltd., Grocery Outlet Holding Corp., and Sprouts Farmers Markets, Inc. are examples of major food retailers. While e-commerce companies like Amazon have increasingly been ramping-up offerings in the food retail space, several traditional players have also been expanding their online presence to stand their ground against rising competition.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LBLCF($46.3B) has a higher market cap than EMLAF($8.22B). LBLCF has higher P/E ratio than EMLAF: LBLCF (26.46) vs EMLAF (16.65). EMLAF (17.470) and LBLCF (17.421) have similar YTD gains . LBLCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.25B vs. EMLAF (2.44B). LBLCF has more cash in the bank: 1.9B vs. EMLAF (285M). EMLAF has less debt than LBLCF: EMLAF (7.46B) vs LBLCF (19.5B). LBLCF has higher revenues than EMLAF: LBLCF (62.3B) vs EMLAF (31.3B).
EMLAFLBLCFEMLAF / LBLCF
Capitalization8.22B46.3B18%
EBITDA2.44B7.25B34%
Gain YTD17.47017.421100%
P/E Ratio16.6526.4663%
Revenue31.3B62.3B50%
Total Cash285M1.9B15%
Total Debt7.46B19.5B38%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMLAF vs LBLCF: Fundamental Ratings
EMLAF
LBLCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9350
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
553
SMR RATING
1..100
6042
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6056
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3445
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMLAF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LBLCF (93). This means that EMLAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LBLCF’s over the last 12 months.

LBLCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EMLAF (55). This means that LBLCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EMLAF’s over the last 12 months.

LBLCF's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as EMLAF (60). This means that LBLCF’s stock grew similarly to EMLAF’s over the last 12 months.

LBLCF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as EMLAF (60). This means that LBLCF’s stock grew similarly to EMLAF’s over the last 12 months.

EMLAF's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as LBLCF (45). This means that EMLAF’s stock grew similarly to LBLCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMLAFLBLCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMLAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LBLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ESEA62.321.02
+1.66%
Euroseas Ltd
GEG2.66N/A
N/A
Great Elm Group
SMA36.31-0.14
-0.38%
Smartstop Self Storage REIT Inc
NUWE3.57-0.03
-0.83%
Nuwellis Inc
BLD387.31-6.15
-1.56%
TopBuild Corp

EMLAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMLAF and MTRAF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMLAF and MTRAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMLAF
1D Price
Change %
EMLAF100%
N/A
MTRAF - EMLAF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JSAIY - EMLAF
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
KKOYY - EMLAF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
DNOPY - EMLAF
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.15%
LBLCF - EMLAF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
More

LBLCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LBLCF and WNGRF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LBLCF and WNGRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LBLCF
1D Price
Change %
LBLCF100%
-0.50%
WNGRF - LBLCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
CRRFY - LBLCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSS - LBLCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
MTRAF - LBLCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JSAIY - LBLCF
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
More