EMLAF
Price
$37.81
Change
-$0.20 (-0.53%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
8.82B
LBLCF
Price
$41.01
Change
-$0.19 (-0.46%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
48.8B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMLAF vs LBLCF

Header iconEMLAF vs LBLCF Comparison
Open Charts EMLAF vs LBLCFBanner chart's image
Empire
Price$37.81
Change-$0.20 (-0.53%)
Volume$451
Capitalization8.82B
Loblaw Companies
Price$41.01
Change-$0.19 (-0.46%)
Volume$3.23K
Capitalization48.8B
EMLAF vs LBLCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMLAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LBLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMLAF vs. LBLCF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMLAF is a Hold and LBLCF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (EMLAF: $37.81 vs. LBLCF: $41.01)
Brand notoriety: EMLAF and LBLCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMLAF: 17% vs. LBLCF: 14%
Market capitalization -- EMLAF: $8.82B vs. LBLCF: $48.8B
EMLAF [@Food Retail] is valued at $8.82B. LBLCF’s [@Food Retail] market capitalization is $48.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Retail] industry ranges from $48.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Retail] industry is $12.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMLAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLBLCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EMLAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LBLCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LBLCF is a better buy in the long-term than EMLAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMLAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LBLCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMLAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • LBLCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LBLCF is a better buy in the short-term than EMLAF.

Price Growth

EMLAF (@Food Retail) experienced а -2.68% price change this week, while LBLCF (@Food Retail) price change was +0.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Retail industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.84%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Retail (-0.34% weekly)

The food retail industry includes companies that sell food, beverage and household products. Items sold include grocery, gourmet food, fresh produce, and frozen food. Kroger Co., George Weston Ltd., Grocery Outlet Holding Corp., and Sprouts Farmers Markets, Inc. are examples of major food retailers. While e-commerce companies like Amazon have increasingly been ramping-up offerings in the food retail space, several traditional players have also been expanding their online presence to stand their ground against rising competition.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LBLCF($48.8B) has a higher market cap than EMLAF($8.82B). LBLCF has higher P/E ratio than EMLAF: LBLCF (28.04) vs EMLAF (17.80). LBLCF (24.842) and EMLAF (23.927) have similar YTD gains . LBLCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.25B vs. EMLAF (2.44B). LBLCF has higher revenues than EMLAF: LBLCF (62.3B) vs EMLAF (31.3B).
EMLAFLBLCFEMLAF / LBLCF
Capitalization8.82B48.8B18%
EBITDA2.44B7.25B34%
Gain YTD23.92724.84296%
P/E Ratio17.8028.0463%
Revenue31.3B62.3B50%
Total Cash285MN/A-
Total Debt7.46BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMLAF vs LBLCF: Fundamental Ratings
EMLAF
LBLCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
952
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
502
SMR RATING
1..100
6042
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5250
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2142
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMLAF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LBLCF (92). This means that EMLAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LBLCF’s over the last 12 months.

LBLCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EMLAF (50). This means that LBLCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EMLAF’s over the last 12 months.

LBLCF's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as EMLAF (60). This means that LBLCF’s stock grew similarly to EMLAF’s over the last 12 months.

LBLCF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as EMLAF (52). This means that LBLCF’s stock grew similarly to EMLAF’s over the last 12 months.

EMLAF's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as LBLCF (42). This means that EMLAF’s stock grew similarly to LBLCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMLAFLBLCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMLAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LBLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FILG4.380.29
+7.09%
Grayscale Filecoin Trust (FIL)
EAPR28.710.13
+0.46%
Innovator Em Mkts Pwr Bffr ETF - Apr
BIBL43.330.12
+0.28%
Inspire 100 ETF
OPPE47.640.09
+0.20%
WisdomTree European Opportunities ETF
JMOM66.090.13
+0.20%
JPMorgan US Momentum Factor ETF

EMLAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMLAF and MTRAF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMLAF and MTRAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMLAF
1D Price
Change %
EMLAF100%
-0.53%
MTRAF - EMLAF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JSAIY - EMLAF
13%
Poorly correlated
+3.36%
KKOYY - EMLAF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.45%
DNOPY - EMLAF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
LBLCF - EMLAF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
More

LBLCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LBLCF and WNGRF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LBLCF and WNGRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LBLCF
1D Price
Change %
LBLCF100%
-0.47%
WNGRF - LBLCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRRFY - LBLCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSS - LBLCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.15%
MTRAF - LBLCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JSAIY - LBLCF
15%
Poorly correlated
+3.36%
More