Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMLAX vs TRZFX
EMLAX vs TRZFX Comparison
Open Charts EMLAX vs TRZFX
MFS Emerging Markets Debt Lcl Ccy A
Price$5.76
Change+$0.01 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets477.99M
T. Rowe Price Emerg Mkts Lcl Ccy Bd Z
Price$4.95
Change+$0.01 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets291.98M
EMLAX vs TRZFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMLAX has more cash in the bank: 478M vs. TRZFX (292M). TRZFX pays higher dividends than EMLAX: TRZFX (6.91) vs EMLAX (4.27). EMLAX was incepted earlier than TRZFX: EMLAX (14 years) vs TRZFX (4 years). EMLAX (1.26) is less costly to investors than TRZFX (0.77). TRZFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.20 vs. EMLAX (59.00). TRZFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMLAX: TRZFX (0) vs EMLAX (1000). TRZFX (9.79) and EMLAX (9.43) have marching annual gain over last year.
| EMLAX | TRZFX | EMLAX / TRZFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.77 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.106 | 11.958 | 101% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 478M | 292M | 164% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.27 | 6.91 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.43 | 9.79 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.40 | 29.45 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.10 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.58 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers