Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMLMX vs TRZFX
EMLMX vs TRZFX Comparison
Open Charts EMLMX vs TRZFX
MFS Emerging Markets Debt Lcl Ccy R4
Price$5.80
Change-$0.01 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets469.57M
T. Rowe Price Emerg Mkts Lcl Ccy Bd Z
Price$4.96
Change-$0.01 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293.9M
EMLMX vs TRZFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMLMX has more cash in the bank: 470M vs. TRZFX (294M). TRZFX pays higher dividends than EMLMX: TRZFX (6.77) vs EMLMX (4.79). EMLMX was incepted earlier than TRZFX: EMLMX (14 years) vs TRZFX (4 years). EMLMX (1.01) is less costly to investors than TRZFX (0.77). TRZFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.20 vs. EMLMX (59.00). EMLMX (0) and TRZFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. EMLMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.58 vs. TRZFX (11.83).
| EMLMX | TRZFX | EMLMX / TRZFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.77 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.959 | 12.639 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 470M | 294M | 160% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.79 | 6.77 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.58 | 11.83 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.64 | 33.55 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.34 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.76 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers