EMLP | NML | EMLP / NML | |
Gain YTD | 2.274 | -4.170 | -55% |
Net Assets | 3.11B | 521M | 596% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.98 | 48% |
Turnover | 23.00 | 27.00 | 85% |
Yield | 3.14 | 6.42 | 49% |
Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
EMLP | NML | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago88% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago90% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago82% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago90% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago75% | 17 days ago85% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMLP has been closely correlated with ET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EMLP jumps, then ET could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMLP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EMLP | 100% | +0.44% | ||
ET - EMLP | 82% Closely correlated | +0.71% | ||
MPLX - EMLP | 81% Closely correlated | +1.09% | ||
TRGP - EMLP | 81% Closely correlated | +0.85% | ||
PAGP - EMLP | 79% Closely correlated | -0.16% | ||
KMI - EMLP | 79% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that NML and EPD have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NML and EPD's prices will move in lockstep.