EMMS vs GTN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMMS is a Hold and GTN is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EMMS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGTN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- EMMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- GTN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GTN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- GTN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
EMMS (@Broadcasting) experienced а +5.33% price change this week, while GTN (@Broadcasting) price change was -3.55% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Broadcasting industry was -2.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55569.34%.
Reported Earning Dates
EMMS is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.
GTN is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Broadcasting (-2.03% weekly)Broadcasting industry includes companies that operate facilities broadcasting radio and/or television programs. Sirius XM Holdings, Inc. (which provides satellite radio and online radio services); Fox Corporation (news and sports broadcasting on TV); and CBS Corporation (TV broadcasting) are some of the behemoths of this industry. The burgeoning digital space has been a disruption for the industry, propelling them to up the ante on their own digital presence.
| EMMS | GTN | EMMS / GTN | |
| Capitalization | 30.1M | 406M | 7% |
| EBITDA | -29.16M | 1.06B | -3% |
| Gain YTD | -2.769 | 20.635 | -13% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 2.53 | - |
| Revenue | 39.7M | 3.46B | 1% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 69M | - |
| Total Debt | 65.5M | 5.97B | 1% |
EMMS | GTN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 44 Fair valued | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 19 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GTN's Valuation (4) in the Broadcasting industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EMMS (44). This means that GTN’s stock grew somewhat faster than EMMS’s over the last 12 months.
GTN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Broadcasting industry is in the same range as EMMS (100). This means that GTN’s stock grew similarly to EMMS’s over the last 12 months.
EMMS's SMR Rating (19) in the Broadcasting industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GTN (78). This means that EMMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than GTN’s over the last 12 months.
GTN's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Broadcasting industry is in the same range as EMMS (82). This means that GTN’s stock grew similarly to EMMS’s over the last 12 months.
EMMS's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the Broadcasting industry is in the same range as GTN (99). This means that EMMS’s stock grew similarly to GTN’s over the last 12 months.
| GTN | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EAGG | 46.99 | 0.18 | +0.38% |
| iShares ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | |||
| IHYF | 22.68 | 0.02 | +0.11% |
| Invesco High Yield Bond Factor ETF | |||
| WRND | 31.70 | N/A | N/A |
| NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF | |||
| PJUN | 38.11 | -0.21 | -0.55% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Power BffrETF™-Jun | |||
| PCGG | 12.04 | -0.23 | -1.91% |
| Polen Capital Global Growth ETF | |||
EMMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EMMS and SALM have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMMS and SALM's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMMS | 100% | N/A | ||
| SALM - EMMS | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.82% | ||
| CMLS - EMMS | 4% Poorly correlated | -6.98% | ||
| SGA - EMMS | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.91% | ||
| GTN - EMMS | 3% Poorly correlated | -5.00% | ||
| BBGI - EMMS | 2% Poorly correlated | -1.01% | ||
More | ||||
GTN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTN has been closely correlated with NXST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GTN jumps, then NXST could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GTN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTN | 100% | -5.00% | ||
| NXST - GTN | 73% Closely correlated | -3.25% | ||
| SBGI - GTN | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| TGNA - GTN | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.76% | ||
| SSP - GTN | 43% Loosely correlated | -3.76% | ||
| ITVPY - GTN | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
More | ||||