EMMS vs SALM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMMS is a Hold and SALM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EMMS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSALM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- EMMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SALM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
EMMS (@Broadcasting) experienced а +5.33% price change this week, while SALM (@Broadcasting) price change was -14.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Broadcasting industry was -2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56680.71%.
Reported Earning Dates
EMMS is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.
SALM is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Broadcasting (-2.25% weekly)Broadcasting industry includes companies that operate facilities broadcasting radio and/or television programs. Sirius XM Holdings, Inc. (which provides satellite radio and online radio services); Fox Corporation (news and sports broadcasting on TV); and CBS Corporation (TV broadcasting) are some of the behemoths of this industry. The burgeoning digital space has been a disruption for the industry, propelling them to up the ante on their own digital presence.
| EMMS | SALM | EMMS / SALM | |
| Capitalization | 30.1M | 18.3M | 164% |
| EBITDA | -29.16M | -29.4M | 99% |
| Gain YTD | -2.769 | 8.730 | -32% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 39.7M | 262M | 15% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 3K | - |
| Total Debt | 65.5M | 225M | 29% |
EMMS | SALM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 57 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 44 Fair valued | 46 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 19 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | 45 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EMMS's Valuation (44) in the Broadcasting industry is in the same range as SALM (46). This means that EMMS’s stock grew similarly to SALM’s over the last 12 months.
EMMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Broadcasting industry is in the same range as SALM (100). This means that EMMS’s stock grew similarly to SALM’s over the last 12 months.
EMMS's SMR Rating (19) in the Broadcasting industry is significantly better than the same rating for SALM (96). This means that EMMS’s stock grew significantly faster than SALM’s over the last 12 months.
SALM's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Broadcasting industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EMMS (83). This means that SALM’s stock grew somewhat faster than EMMS’s over the last 12 months.
SALM's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the Broadcasting industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EMMS (93). This means that SALM’s stock grew somewhat faster than EMMS’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XOMO | 14.64 | 0.20 | +1.41% |
| YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
| IDVO | 32.88 | 0.17 | +0.52% |
| Amplify CWP International Enh Div IncETF | |||
| PYLD | 26.23 | 0.04 | +0.15% |
| PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF | |||
| ULST | 40.53 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| SPDR® SSgA Ultra Short Term Bond ETF | |||
| PSWD | 36.91 | N/A | N/A |
| Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Eq ETF | |||
EMMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EMMS and SALM have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMMS and SALM's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMMS | 100% | N/A | ||
| SALM - EMMS | 10% Poorly correlated | -2.14% | ||
| CMLS - EMMS | 4% Poorly correlated | +2.05% | ||
| SGA - EMMS | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.98% | ||
| GTN - EMMS | 3% Poorly correlated | -2.44% | ||
| BBGI - EMMS | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.13% | ||
More | ||||
SALM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SALM and FUBO have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SALM and FUBO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SALM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SALM | 100% | -2.14% | ||
| FUBO - SALM | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.26% | ||
| CURI - SALM | 13% Poorly correlated | +4.36% | ||
| EMMS - SALM | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IHRT - SALM | 10% Poorly correlated | -3.96% | ||
| UONE - SALM | 6% Poorly correlated | +1.20% | ||
More | ||||