EMMS
Price
$3.05
Change
-$0.31 (-9.23%)
Updated
Dec 19 closing price
17 days until earnings call
SALM
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.01 (-5.00%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
73 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EMMS vs SALM

Header iconEMMS vs SALM Comparison
Open Charts EMMS vs SALMBanner chart's image
Emmis
Price$3.05
Change-$0.31 (-9.23%)
Volume$2.33K
CapitalizationN/A
Salem Media Group
Price$0.20
Change-$0.01 (-5.00%)
Volume$153.5K
CapitalizationN/A
EMMS vs SALM Comparison Chart
Loading...
EMMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SALM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMMS vs. SALM commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMMS is a Hold and SALM is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (EMMS: $3.05 vs. SALM: $0.19)
Brand notoriety: EMMS and SALM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Broadcasting industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMMS: 129% vs. SALM: 362%
Market capitalization -- EMMS: $30.15M vs. SALM: $5.31M
EMMS [@Broadcasting] is valued at $30.15M. SALM’s [@Broadcasting] market capitalization is $5.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Broadcasting] industry ranges from $18.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Broadcasting] industry is $1.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMMS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSALM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EMMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SALM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EMMS and SALM are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMMS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SALM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMMS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SALM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EMMS is a better buy in the short-term than SALM.

Price Growth

EMMS (@Broadcasting) experienced а -23.75% price change this week, while SALM (@Broadcasting) price change was +11.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Broadcasting industry was +0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8673629.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

EMMS is expected to report earnings on Jan 09, 2025.

SALM is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Broadcasting (+0.04% weekly)

Broadcasting industry includes companies that operate facilities broadcasting radio and/or television programs. Sirius XM Holdings, Inc. (which provides satellite radio and online radio services); Fox Corporation (news and sports broadcasting on TV); and CBS Corporation (TV broadcasting) are some of the behemoths of this industry. The burgeoning digital space has been a disruption for the industry, propelling them to up the ante on their own digital presence.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMMS($30.1M) has a higher market cap than SALM($5.31M). EMMS YTD gains are higher at: -39.000 vs. SALM (-50.000). EMMS (-29.16M) and SALM (-29.4M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . EMMS has less debt than SALM: EMMS (65.5M) vs SALM (225M). SALM has higher revenues than EMMS: SALM (262M) vs EMMS (39.7M).
EMMSSALMEMMS / SALM
Capitalization30.1M5.31M567%
EBITDA-29.16M-29.4M99%
Gain YTD-39.000-50.00078%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue39.7M262M15%
Total CashN/A3K-
Total Debt65.5M225M29%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMMS vs SALM: Fundamental Ratings
EMMS
SALM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
1996
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9089
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9346
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
16n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMMS's Valuation (44) in the Broadcasting industry is in the same range as SALM (46). This means that EMMS’s stock grew similarly to SALM’s over the last 12 months.

EMMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Broadcasting industry is in the same range as SALM (100). This means that EMMS’s stock grew similarly to SALM’s over the last 12 months.

EMMS's SMR Rating (19) in the Broadcasting industry is significantly better than the same rating for SALM (96). This means that EMMS’s stock grew significantly faster than SALM’s over the last 12 months.

SALM's Price Growth Rating (89) in the Broadcasting industry is in the same range as EMMS (90). This means that SALM’s stock grew similarly to EMMS’s over the last 12 months.

SALM's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Broadcasting industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EMMS (93). This means that SALM’s stock grew somewhat faster than EMMS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMMSSALM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EMMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SALM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AFOIX18.340.42
+2.34%
Alger Mid Cap Focus I
VMGIX102.081.75
+1.74%
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Investor
EVTMX15.870.17
+1.08%
Eaton Vance Dividend Builder A
HRLAX8.470.07
+0.83%
Hartford Real Asset A
MBCNX15.800.08
+0.51%
MassMutual Blue Chip Growth R3

EMMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMMS and SALM have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMMS and SALM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMMS
1D Price
Change %
EMMS100%
N/A
SALM - EMMS
10%
Poorly correlated
-4.36%
CMLS - EMMS
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.18%
SGA - EMMS
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GTN - EMMS
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
BBGI - EMMS
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.45%
More

SALM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SALM and FUBO have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SALM and FUBO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SALM
1D Price
Change %
SALM100%
-4.36%
FUBO - SALM
18%
Poorly correlated
+5.30%
CURI - SALM
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.99%
EMMS - SALM
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IHRT - SALM
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
UONE - SALM
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.53%
More