EMMS vs SALM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMMS is a Hold and SALM is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EMMS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSALM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- EMMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SALM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SALM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- SALM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
EMMS (@Broadcasting) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SALM (@Broadcasting) price change was +8.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Broadcasting industry was -6.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.89%.
Reported Earning Dates
EMMS is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.
SALM is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Broadcasting (-6.19% weekly)Broadcasting industry includes companies that operate facilities broadcasting radio and/or television programs. Sirius XM Holdings, Inc. (which provides satellite radio and online radio services); Fox Corporation (news and sports broadcasting on TV); and CBS Corporation (TV broadcasting) are some of the behemoths of this industry. The burgeoning digital space has been a disruption for the industry, propelling them to up the ante on their own digital presence.
| EMMS | SALM | EMMS / SALM | |
| Capitalization | 30.1M | 15.3M | 197% |
| EBITDA | -29.16M | -29.4M | 99% |
| Gain YTD | -23.077 | -10.623 | 217% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 39.7M | 262M | 15% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 3K | - |
| Total Debt | 65.5M | 225M | 29% |
EMMS | SALM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 43 Fair valued | 44 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 19 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 38 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EMMS's Valuation (43) in the Broadcasting industry is in the same range as SALM (44). This means that EMMS’s stock grew similarly to SALM’s over the last 12 months.
EMMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Broadcasting industry is in the same range as SALM (100). This means that EMMS’s stock grew similarly to SALM’s over the last 12 months.
EMMS's SMR Rating (19) in the Broadcasting industry is significantly better than the same rating for SALM (96). This means that EMMS’s stock grew significantly faster than SALM’s over the last 12 months.
SALM's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Broadcasting industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EMMS (84). This means that SALM’s stock grew somewhat faster than EMMS’s over the last 12 months.
SALM's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Broadcasting industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EMMS (90). This means that SALM’s stock grew somewhat faster than EMMS’s over the last 12 months.
| SALM | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SQQQ | 42.53 | 5.93 | +16.20% |
| ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | |||
| IQHI | 25.92 | N/A | N/A |
| NYLI MacKay High Income ETF | |||
| FLRT | 46.77 | -0.28 | -0.60% |
| Pacer Pacific Asset Fltng Rt Hi Inc ETF | |||
| RFEU | 64.07 | -0.48 | -0.75% |
| First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Eurp ETF | |||
| IJAN | 31.58 | -0.42 | -1.31% |
| Innovator Itnl Dvp Pwr Buff ETF™ Jan | |||
EMMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EMMS and SALM have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMMS and SALM's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMMS | 100% | N/A | ||
| SALM - EMMS | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.59% | ||
| CMLS - EMMS | 4% Poorly correlated | -10.13% | ||
| SGA - EMMS | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
| GTN - EMMS | 3% Poorly correlated | -10.32% | ||
| BBGI - EMMS | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.72% | ||
More | ||||
SALM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SALM and FUBO have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SALM and FUBO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SALM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SALM | 100% | +0.59% | ||
| FUBO - SALM | 18% Poorly correlated | -4.13% | ||
| CURI - SALM | 13% Poorly correlated | -2.93% | ||
| EMMS - SALM | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IHRT - SALM | 10% Poorly correlated | -13.07% | ||
| UONE - SALM | 6% Poorly correlated | -2.80% | ||
More | ||||