EMN
Price
$82.01
Change
-$6.28 (-7.11%)
Updated
Apr 3, 02:36 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.8B
21 days until earnings call
LIN
Price
$467.20
Change
-$2.54 (-0.54%)
Updated
Apr 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
223.16B
28 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EMN vs LIN

Header iconEMN vs LIN Comparison
Open Charts EMN vs LINBanner chart's image
Eastman Chemical
Price$82.01
Change-$6.28 (-7.11%)
Volume$1.6K
Capitalization11.8B
Linde
Price$467.20
Change-$2.54 (-0.54%)
Volume$37.87K
Capitalization223.16B
EMN vs LIN Comparison Chart
Loading...
EMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMN vs. LIN commentary
Apr 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMN is a Hold and LIN is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 03, 2025
Stock price -- (EMN: $88.29 vs. LIN: $469.74)
Brand notoriety: EMN and LIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMN: 68% vs. LIN: 66%
Market capitalization -- EMN: $11.8B vs. LIN: $223.16B
EMN [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $11.8B. LIN’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $223.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EMN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EMN is a better buy in the long-term than LIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LIN is a better buy in the short-term than EMN.

Price Growth

EMN (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -1.41% price change this week, while LIN (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +1.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -3.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

EMN is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

LIN is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-3.16% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIN($223B) has a higher market cap than EMN($11.8B). LIN has higher P/E ratio than EMN: LIN (36.81) vs EMN (13.39). LIN YTD gains are higher at: 12.572 vs. EMN (-2.424). LIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.2B vs. EMN (1.81B). LIN has more cash in the bank: 4.66B vs. EMN (548M). EMN has less debt than LIN: EMN (4.85B) vs LIN (20.3B). LIN has higher revenues than EMN: LIN (32.9B) vs EMN (9.21B).
EMNLINEMN / LIN
Capitalization11.8B223B5%
EBITDA1.81B12.2B15%
Gain YTD-2.42412.572-19%
P/E Ratio13.3936.8136%
Revenue9.21B32.9B28%
Total Cash548M4.66B12%
Total Debt4.85B20.3B24%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMN vs LIN: Fundamental Ratings
EMN
LIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
714
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
384
SMR RATING
1..100
5352
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6242
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6453
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMN's Valuation (35) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LIN (85) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that EMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than LIN’s over the last 12 months.

LIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EMN (38) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than EMN’s over the last 12 months.

LIN's SMR Rating (52) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as EMN (53) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew similarly to EMN’s over the last 12 months.

LIN's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as EMN (62) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew similarly to EMN’s over the last 12 months.

LIN's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as EMN (64) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew similarly to EMN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMNLIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IPO38.540.72
+1.90%
Renaissance IPO ETF
IWF366.862.98
+0.82%
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
SOR41.720.10
+0.23%
Source Capital
LBAY25.52-0.16
-0.61%
Leatherback Long/Short Alt Yld ETF
SH44.14-0.28
-0.63%
ProShares Short S&P500

EMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMN has been closely correlated with HUN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EMN jumps, then HUN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMN
1D Price
Change %
EMN100%
+0.24%
HUN - EMN
73%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
DOW - EMN
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
AVNT - EMN
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.68%
LYB - EMN
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
WLK - EMN
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.03%
More