EMN
Price
$79.57
Change
-$0.35 (-0.44%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
11.8B
27 days until earnings call
LIN
Price
$475.58
Change
-$1.59 (-0.33%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
223.16B
20 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMN vs LIN

Header iconEMN vs LIN Comparison
Open Charts EMN vs LINBanner chart's image
Eastman Chemical
Price$79.57
Change-$0.35 (-0.44%)
Volume$798.04K
Capitalization11.8B
Linde
Price$475.58
Change-$1.59 (-0.33%)
Volume$952.72K
Capitalization223.16B
EMN vs LIN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMN vs. LIN commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMN is a Buy and LIN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (EMN: $79.57 vs. LIN: $475.58)
Brand notoriety: EMN and LIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMN: 42% vs. LIN: 55%
Market capitalization -- EMN: $11.8B vs. LIN: $223.16B
EMN [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $11.8B. LIN’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $223.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LIN is a better buy in the long-term than EMN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LIN is a better buy in the short-term than EMN.

Price Growth

EMN (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +4.49% price change this week, while LIN (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +2.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +2.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

EMN is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

LIN is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+2.99% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIN($223B) has a higher market cap than EMN($11.8B). LIN has higher P/E ratio than EMN: LIN (36.81) vs EMN (13.39). LIN YTD gains are higher at: 14.341 vs. EMN (-11.126). LIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.2B vs. EMN (1.81B). LIN has more cash in the bank: 4.66B vs. EMN (548M). EMN has less debt than LIN: EMN (4.85B) vs LIN (20.3B). LIN has higher revenues than EMN: LIN (32.9B) vs EMN (9.21B).
EMNLINEMN / LIN
Capitalization11.8B223B5%
EBITDA1.81B12.2B15%
Gain YTD-11.12614.341-78%
P/E Ratio13.3936.8136%
Revenue9.21B32.9B28%
Total Cash548M4.66B12%
Total Debt4.85B20.3B24%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMN vs LIN: Fundamental Ratings
EMN
LIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1417
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
735
SMR RATING
1..100
5250
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6037
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7753
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMN's Valuation (33) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LIN (86) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that EMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than LIN’s over the last 12 months.

LIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is significantly better than the same rating for EMN (73) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew significantly faster than EMN’s over the last 12 months.

LIN's SMR Rating (50) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as EMN (52) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew similarly to EMN’s over the last 12 months.

LIN's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as EMN (60) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew similarly to EMN’s over the last 12 months.

LIN's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as EMN (77) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that LIN’s stock grew similarly to EMN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMNLIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FNOV50.540.26
+0.52%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Nov
KMDIX31.18N/A
N/A
Keeley Gabelli Mid Cap Dividend I
CNYAUD0.21N/A
N/A
China Yuan - Australian Dollar
GBPAUD2.07N/A
N/A
United Kingdom Pound - Australian Dollar
IAPR29.25-0.01
-0.03%
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF Apr

EMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMN has been closely correlated with DD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EMN jumps, then DD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMN
1D Price
Change %
EMN100%
-0.44%
DD - EMN
77%
Closely correlated
+1.06%
LYB - EMN
76%
Closely correlated
-0.88%
AVNT - EMN
75%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
DOW - EMN
74%
Closely correlated
-0.94%
HUN - EMN
73%
Closely correlated
-1.86%
More