EMNSF
Price
$2.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
1.27B
FLRAF
Price
$1.57
Change
+$0.21 (+15.44%)
Updated
Jul 15 closing price
Capitalization
378.98M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMNSF vs FLRAF

Header iconEMNSF vs FLRAF Comparison
Open Charts EMNSF vs FLRAFBanner chart's image
Elementis
Price$2.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$20K
Capitalization1.27B
Essentra
Price$1.57
Change+$0.21 (+15.44%)
Volume$155
Capitalization378.98M
EMNSF vs FLRAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMNSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMNSF vs. FLRAF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMNSF is a Hold and FLRAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (EMNSF: $2.26 vs. FLRAF: $1.57)
Brand notoriety: EMNSF and FLRAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMNSF: 59% vs. FLRAF: 69%
Market capitalization -- EMNSF: $1.27B vs. FLRAF: $378.98M
EMNSF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $1.27B. FLRAF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $378.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $220.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMNSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFLRAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EMNSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FLRAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EMNSF is a better buy in the long-term than FLRAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMNSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLRAF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMNSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FLRAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EMNSF is a better buy in the short-term than FLRAF.

Price Growth

EMNSF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FLRAF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-1.17% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMNSF($1.27B) has a higher market cap than FLRAF($379M). EMNSF (37.66) and FLRAF (36.50) have similar P/E ratio . EMNSF YTD gains are higher at: 33.582 vs. FLRAF (-4.652). FLRAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 46M vs. EMNSF (29.8M). EMNSF has more cash in the bank: 58.8M vs. FLRAF (41.3M). FLRAF has less debt than EMNSF: FLRAF (137M) vs EMNSF (204M). EMNSF has higher revenues than FLRAF: EMNSF (732M) vs FLRAF (295M).
EMNSFFLRAFEMNSF / FLRAF
Capitalization1.27B379M334%
EBITDA29.8M46M65%
Gain YTD33.582-4.652-722%
P/E Ratio37.6636.50103%
Revenue732M295M248%
Total Cash58.8M41.3M142%
Total Debt204M137M149%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMNSF vs FLRAF: Fundamental Ratings
EMNSF
FLRAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9338
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
56100
SMR RATING
1..100
9488
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4956
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
46100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMNSF's Valuation (47) in the null industry is in the same range as FLRAF (58). This means that EMNSF’s stock grew similarly to FLRAF’s over the last 12 months.

EMNSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLRAF (100). This means that EMNSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FLRAF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as EMNSF (94). This means that FLRAF’s stock grew similarly to EMNSF’s over the last 12 months.

EMNSF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as FLRAF (56). This means that EMNSF’s stock grew similarly to FLRAF’s over the last 12 months.

EMNSF's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLRAF (100). This means that EMNSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLRAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMNSFFLRAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
43%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMNSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HLMEX19.36N/A
N/A
Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Port I
HILTX23.48N/A
N/A
Hartford International Value R5
GWGIX19.40N/A
N/A
AMG GW&K Small Mid Cap Core I
WESWX11.47N/A
N/A
TETON Westwood Equity AAA
TFIFX48.29N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Financial Services I

EMNSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMNSF and EVKIF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMNSF and EVKIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMNSF
1D Price
Change %
EMNSF100%
N/A
EVKIF - EMNSF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPLSF - EMNSF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.62%
FLRAF - EMNSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGPHF - EMNSF
2%
Poorly correlated
+5.17%
EVKIY - EMNSF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.87%
More

FLRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLRAF and EMNSF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLRAF and EMNSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLRAF
1D Price
Change %
FLRAF100%
N/A
EMNSF - FLRAF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVKIF - FLRAF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGPHF - FLRAF
2%
Poorly correlated
+5.17%
FPLSF - FLRAF
2%
Poorly correlated
+3.62%
EVKIY - FLRAF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.87%
More