EMNSF
Price
$2.26
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
1.31B
FLRAF
Price
$1.57
Change
+$0.21 (+15.44%)
Updated
Jul 15 closing price
Capitalization
388.51M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMNSF vs FLRAF

Header iconEMNSF vs FLRAF Comparison
Open Charts EMNSF vs FLRAFBanner chart's image
Elementis
Price$2.26
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10.54K
Capitalization1.31B
Essentra
Price$1.57
Change+$0.21 (+15.44%)
Volume$155
Capitalization388.51M
EMNSF vs FLRAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMNSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMNSF vs. FLRAF commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMNSF is a StrongBuy and FLRAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (EMNSF: $2.26 vs. FLRAF: $1.57)
Brand notoriety: EMNSF and FLRAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMNSF: 35% vs. FLRAF: 52%
Market capitalization -- EMNSF: $1.31B vs. FLRAF: $388.51M
EMNSF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $1.31B. FLRAF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $388.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $225.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMNSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFLRAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EMNSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FLRAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EMNSF is a better buy in the long-term than FLRAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMNSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLRAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMNSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FLRAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLRAF is a better buy in the short-term than EMNSF.

Price Growth

EMNSF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -0.76% price change this week, while FLRAF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +4.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.25%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+4.50% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMNSF($1.31B) has a higher market cap than FLRAF($389M). EMNSF (37.66) and FLRAF (36.12) have similar P/E ratio . EMNSF YTD gains are higher at: 33.748 vs. FLRAF (-4.652). FLRAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 46M vs. EMNSF (29.8M). EMNSF has more cash in the bank: 58.8M vs. FLRAF (41.3M). FLRAF has less debt than EMNSF: FLRAF (137M) vs EMNSF (204M). EMNSF has higher revenues than FLRAF: EMNSF (732M) vs FLRAF (295M).
EMNSFFLRAFEMNSF / FLRAF
Capitalization1.31B389M337%
EBITDA29.8M46M65%
Gain YTD33.748-4.652-725%
P/E Ratio37.6636.12104%
Revenue732M295M248%
Total Cash58.8M41.3M142%
Total Debt204M137M149%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMNSF vs FLRAF: Fundamental Ratings
EMNSF
FLRAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9438
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57100
SMR RATING
1..100
9387
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4655
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
46100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMNSF's Valuation (48) in the null industry is in the same range as FLRAF (52). This means that EMNSF’s stock grew similarly to FLRAF’s over the last 12 months.

EMNSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLRAF (100). This means that EMNSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FLRAF's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as EMNSF (93). This means that FLRAF’s stock grew similarly to EMNSF’s over the last 12 months.

EMNSF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as FLRAF (55). This means that EMNSF’s stock grew similarly to FLRAF’s over the last 12 months.

EMNSF's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLRAF (100). This means that EMNSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLRAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMNSFFLRAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
22%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
21%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
19%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
21%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMNSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RMGYX11.620.01
+0.09%
Russell Inv Multi-Asset Strat Y
MXCAX12.38N/A
N/A
BlackRock Emerging Markets Ex-Chn Inv A
SSIQX13.99N/A
N/A
State Street International Stock Sel K
OMSOX30.14N/A
N/A
Invesco Main Street All Cap A
JEPSX14.07N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Equity Premium Income R5

EMNSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMNSF and EVKIF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMNSF and EVKIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMNSF
1D Price
Change %
EMNSF100%
N/A
EVKIF - EMNSF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPLSF - EMNSF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.93%
FLRAF - EMNSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGPHF - EMNSF
2%
Poorly correlated
-13.67%
EVKIY - EMNSF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
More

FLRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLRAF and EMNSF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLRAF and EMNSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLRAF
1D Price
Change %
FLRAF100%
N/A
EMNSF - FLRAF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVKIF - FLRAF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGPHF - FLRAF
2%
Poorly correlated
-13.67%
FPLSF - FLRAF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.93%
EVKIY - FLRAF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
More