EMNSF
Price
$1.91
Change
-$0.02 (-1.04%)
Updated
Oct 15 closing price
FPLSF
Price
$4.58
Change
-$0.02 (-0.43%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

EMNSF vs FPLSF

Header iconEMNSF vs FPLSF Comparison
Open Charts EMNSF vs FPLSFBanner chart's image
Elementis
Price$1.91
Change-$0.02 (-1.04%)
Volume$130
CapitalizationN/A
5N Plus
Price$4.58
Change-$0.02 (-0.43%)
Volume$662
CapitalizationN/A
EMNSF vs FPLSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
EMNSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FPLSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMNSF vs. FPLSF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMNSF is a Buy and FPLSF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (EMNSF: $1.91 vs. FPLSF: $4.58)
Brand notoriety: EMNSF and FPLSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMNSF: 93% vs. FPLSF: 52%
Market capitalization -- EMNSF: $834.52M vs. FPLSF: $246.9M
EMNSF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $834.52M. FPLSF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $246.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $8.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMNSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFPLSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EMNSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FPLSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FPLSF is a better buy in the long-term than EMNSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMNSF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FPLSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMNSF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • FPLSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FPLSF is a better buy in the short-term than EMNSF.

Price Growth

EMNSF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FPLSF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +1.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -3.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.64%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-3.00% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMNSF($835M) has a higher market cap than FPLSF($247M). EMNSF has higher P/E ratio than FPLSF: EMNSF (322.58) vs FPLSF (21.01). FPLSF YTD gains are higher at: 61.837 vs. EMNSF (23.226). EMNSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 41.3M vs. FPLSF (14.1M). EMNSF has more cash in the bank: 67.3M vs. FPLSF (41.4M). FPLSF has less debt than EMNSF: FPLSF (151M) vs EMNSF (355M). EMNSF has higher revenues than FPLSF: EMNSF (713M) vs FPLSF (255M).
EMNSFFPLSFEMNSF / FPLSF
Capitalization835M247M338%
EBITDA41.3M14.1M293%
Gain YTD23.22661.83738%
P/E Ratio322.5821.011,535%
Revenue713M255M280%
Total Cash67.3M41.4M163%
Total Debt355M151M235%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMNSF vs FPLSF: Fundamental Ratings
EMNSF
FPLSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3984
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10031
SMR RATING
1..100
9162
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5347
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5333
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7595

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMNSF's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as FPLSF (88). This means that EMNSF’s stock grew similarly to FPLSF’s over the last 12 months.

FPLSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EMNSF (100). This means that FPLSF’s stock grew significantly faster than EMNSF’s over the last 12 months.

FPLSF's SMR Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as EMNSF (91). This means that FPLSF’s stock grew similarly to EMNSF’s over the last 12 months.

FPLSF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as EMNSF (53). This means that FPLSF’s stock grew similarly to EMNSF’s over the last 12 months.

FPLSF's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as EMNSF (53). This means that FPLSF’s stock grew similarly to EMNSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMNSFFPLSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EMNSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FPLSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HLCTX11.68-0.01
-0.09%
Harding Loevner Intl Carb Trans Eq Inst
IDIVX19.79-0.09
-0.45%
Integrity Dividend Harvest A
MLOZX8.40-0.04
-0.47%
Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Z
ABSAX25.37-0.38
-1.48%
American Beacon Small Cp Val A
NEJYX21.95-0.37
-1.66%
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Small Cap Value Y

EMNSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMNSF and EVKIF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMNSF and EVKIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMNSF
1D Price
Change %
EMNSF100%
N/A
EVKIF - EMNSF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPLSF - EMNSF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
FLRAF - EMNSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGPHF - EMNSF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVKIY - EMNSF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
More

FPLSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FPLSF and EMNSF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPLSF and EMNSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FPLSF
1D Price
Change %
FPLSF100%
-0.43%
EMNSF - FPLSF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FUPPF - FPLSF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVKIF - FPLSF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVKIY - FPLSF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
ELKEF - FPLSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More