Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMOIX vs NMBAX
EMOIX vs NMBAX Comparison
Open Charts EMOIX vs NMBAX
Eaton Vance Municipal Opportunities I
Price$11.47
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets745.38M
Nuveen Intermediate Duration Muni Bd A
Price$8.90
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.24B
EMOIX vs NMBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMOIX vs. NMBAX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMOIX is a Hold and NMBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMBAX has more cash in the bank: 8.24B vs. EMOIX (745M). EMOIX pays higher dividends than NMBAX: EMOIX (3.24) vs NMBAX (3.08). EMOIX was incepted earlier than NMBAX: EMOIX (14 years) vs NMBAX (30 years). EMOIX (0.73) is less costly to investors than NMBAX (0.64). EMOIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 152.00 vs. NMBAX (27.00). NMBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMOIX: NMBAX (2500) vs EMOIX (1000000). EMOIX (3.25) and NMBAX (3.17) have marching annual gain over last year. NMBAX return over 5 years is better than : 6.55 vs. EMOIX (5.00).
| EMOIX | NMBAX | EMOIX / NMBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.64 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.64 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.717 | 3.902 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 745M | 8.24B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.24 | 3.08 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.25 | 3.17 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.49 | 14.46 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.00 | 6.55 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.78 | 17.83 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement