Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMOIX vs NMBAX
EMOIX vs NMBAX Comparison
Open Charts EMOIX vs NMBAX
Eaton Vance Municipal Opportunities I
Price$11.48
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets767.93M
Nuveen Intermediate Duration Muni Bd A
Price$8.89
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.37B
EMOIX vs NMBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMOIX vs. NMBAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMOIX is a Hold and NMBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMBAX has more cash in the bank: 8.37B vs. EMOIX (768M). EMOIX pays higher dividends than NMBAX: EMOIX (3.51) vs NMBAX (3.08). EMOIX was incepted earlier than NMBAX: EMOIX (14 years) vs NMBAX (30 years). EMOIX (0.73) is less costly to investors than NMBAX (0.64). EMOIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 152.00 vs. NMBAX (27.00). NMBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMOIX: NMBAX (2500) vs EMOIX (1000000). EMOIX (3.70) and NMBAX (3.65) have marching annual gain over last year. NMBAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.51 vs. EMOIX (4.02).
| EMOIX | NMBAX | EMOIX / NMBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.64 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.64 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.106 | 4.066 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 768M | 8.37B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.51 | 3.08 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.70 | 3.65 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.30 | 12.95 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.02 | 5.51 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.69 | 18.02 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement