Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMQCX vs RNWAX
EMQCX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts EMQCX vs RNWAX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Eq C
Price$8.71
Change+$0.04 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.49M
American Funds New World R1
Price$85.15
Change+$0.22 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.13B
EMQCX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMQCX vs. RNWAX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMQCX is a Buy and RNWAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 70.1B vs. EMQCX (12.5M). EMQCX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: EMQCX (1.79) vs RNWAX (0.00). EMQCX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: EMQCX (9 years) vs RNWAX (23 years). EMQCX (3.02) is less costly to investors than RNWAX (1.66). EMQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 237.00 vs. RNWAX (37.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMQCX: RNWAX (250) vs EMQCX (1000). EMQCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.46 vs. RNWAX (10.26). RNWAX return over 5 years is better than : 24.40 vs. EMQCX (-12.01).
| EMQCX | RNWAX | EMQCX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.66 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.02 | 1.66 | 182% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.987 | 15.646 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5M | 70.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.46 | 10.26 | 200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.90 | 38.34 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.01 | 24.40 | -49% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 60.65 | - |