Ad is loading...
EMQCX vs RNWAX
EMQCX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts EMQCX vs RNWAX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Eq C
Price$8.00
Change-$0.01 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.16M
American Funds New World R1
Price$76.83
Change-$0.42 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.63B
EMQCX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMQCX vs. RNWAX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMQCX is a Buy and RNWAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 63.6B vs. EMQCX (23.2M). EMQCX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: EMQCX (1.05) vs RNWAX (0.61). EMQCX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: EMQCX (8 years) vs RNWAX (23 years). EMQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 189.00 vs. RNWAX (32.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMQCX: RNWAX (250) vs EMQCX (1000). EMQCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.33 vs. RNWAX (3.89). RNWAX return over 5 years is better than : 12.95 vs. EMQCX (-23.25).
| EMQCX | RNWAX | EMQCX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.672 | 4.346 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.2M | 63.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.61 | 171% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.33 | 3.89 | 471% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.09 | 3.88 | -131% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.25 | 12.95 | -179% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 43.58 | - |