Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMQCX vs RNWBX
EMQCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMQCX vs RNWBX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Eq C
Price$9.52
Change-$0.05 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.82M
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.96
Change-$0.29 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.16B
EMQCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMQCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMQCX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. EMQCX (13.8M). EMQCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMQCX (1.44) vs RNWBX (0.12). EMQCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMQCX (9 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). EMQCX (3.02) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). EMQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 237.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMQCX: RNWBX (250) vs EMQCX (1000). EMQCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.89 vs. RNWBX (11.48). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 25.41 vs. EMQCX (-8.91).
| EMQCX | RNWBX | EMQCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.67 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.02 | 1.67 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.131 | 23.671 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.8M | 75.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.12 | 1,191% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.89 | 11.48 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.74 | 54.43 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.91 | 25.41 | -35% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 86.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement