Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMQCX vs RNWBX
EMQCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMQCX vs RNWBX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Eq C
Price$9.26
Change-$0.04 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13M
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.39
Change-$0.11 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.13B
EMQCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMQCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMQCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. EMQCX (13M). EMQCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMQCX (1.40) vs RNWBX (0.12). EMQCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMQCX (9 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). EMQCX (3.02) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). EMQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 237.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMQCX: RNWBX (250) vs EMQCX (1000). EMQCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.25 vs. RNWBX (17.87). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 15.89 vs. EMQCX (-18.09).
| EMQCX | RNWBX | EMQCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.67 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.02 | 1.67 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.487 | 22.896 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13M | 74.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.12 | 1,191% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.25 | 17.87 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.87 | 43.03 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.09 | 15.89 | -114% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.21 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement