Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMSQX vs RNWBX
EMSQX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMSQX vs RNWBX
Shelton Emerging Markets Institutiona
Price$20.20
Change-$0.16 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.04M
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.70
Change+$0.31 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.77B
EMSQX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMSQX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMSQX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. EMSQX (25M). EMSQX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMSQX (3.51) vs RNWBX (0.13). EMSQX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMSQX (29 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). EMSQX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). EMSQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMSQX: RNWBX (250) vs EMSQX (500000). EMSQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.40 vs. RNWBX (11.99). EMSQX return over 5 years is better than : 44.55 vs. RNWBX (18.24).
| EMSQX | RNWBX | EMSQX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.67 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.67 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.118 | 17.879 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25M | 71.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.51 | 0.13 | 2,717% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.40 | 11.99 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.16 | 36.12 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.55 | 18.24 | 244% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.03 | 81.10 | 99% |