Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMSQX vs RNWBX
EMSQX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMSQX vs RNWBX
Shelton Emerging Markets Institutiona
Price$19.90
Change+$0.25 (+1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.47M
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.41
Change+$0.71 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.98B
EMSQX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMSQX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMSQX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70B vs. EMSQX (24.5M). EMSQX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMSQX (3.51) vs RNWBX (0.13). EMSQX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMSQX (28 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). EMSQX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). EMSQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMSQX: RNWBX (250) vs EMSQX (500000). EMSQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.97 vs. RNWBX (17.48). EMSQX return over 5 years is better than : 40.42 vs. RNWBX (21.46).
| EMSQX | RNWBX | EMSQX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.67 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.67 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.895 | 16.125 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.5M | 70B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.51 | 0.13 | 2,717% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.97 | 17.48 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.71 | 30.84 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.42 | 21.46 | 188% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.52 | 64.57 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement