Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMSQX vs RNWBX
EMSQX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMSQX vs RNWBX
Shelton Emerging Markets Institutiona
Price$21.34
Change-$0.05 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.53M
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.39
Change-$0.11 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.13B
EMSQX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMSQX vs. RNWBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMSQX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. EMSQX (21.5M). EMSQX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMSQX (3.12) vs RNWBX (0.12). EMSQX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMSQX (29 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). EMSQX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). EMSQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMSQX: RNWBX (250) vs EMSQX (500000). EMSQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.54 vs. RNWBX (17.87). EMSQX return over 5 years is better than : 30.65 vs. RNWBX (15.89).
| EMSQX | RNWBX | EMSQX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.67 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.67 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.246 | 22.896 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.5M | 74.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.12 | 0.12 | 2,656% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.54 | 17.87 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.07 | 43.03 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.65 | 15.89 | 193% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.62 | 82.21 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement