Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMSQX vs RNWBX
EMSQX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMSQX vs RNWBX
Shelton Emerging Markets Institutiona
Price$22.11
Change+$0.07 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.8M
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.96
Change-$0.29 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.16B
EMSQX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMSQX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMSQX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. EMSQX (22.8M). EMSQX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMSQX (3.19) vs RNWBX (0.12). EMSQX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMSQX (29 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). EMSQX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). EMSQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMSQX: RNWBX (250) vs EMSQX (500000). EMSQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.52 vs. RNWBX (11.48). EMSQX return over 5 years is better than : 49.03 vs. RNWBX (25.41).
| EMSQX | RNWBX | EMSQX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.67 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.67 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.112 | 23.671 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.8M | 75.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.19 | 0.12 | 2,643% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.52 | 11.48 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.33 | 54.43 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.03 | 25.41 | 193% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.02 | 86.19 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement