EMX
Price
$4.59
Change
+$0.20 (+4.56%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
500.5M
42 days until earnings call
GRSLF
Price
$0.24
Change
+$0.02 (+9.09%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
105.58M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMX vs GRSLF

Header iconEMX vs GRSLF Comparison
Open Charts EMX vs GRSLFBanner chart's image
EMX Royalty
Price$4.59
Change+$0.20 (+4.56%)
Volume$765.12K
Capitalization500.5M
GR SILVER MNG
Price$0.24
Change+$0.02 (+9.09%)
Volume$1.58M
Capitalization105.58M
EMX vs GRSLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRSLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMX vs. GRSLF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMX is a Buy and GRSLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (EMX: $4.59 vs. GRSLF: $0.24)
Brand notoriety: EMX and GRSLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMX: 105% vs. GRSLF: 164%
Market capitalization -- EMX: $500.5M vs. GRSLF: $105.58M
EMX [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $500.5M. GRSLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $105.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGRSLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EMX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GRSLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EMX is a better buy in the long-term than GRSLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMX’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRSLF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GRSLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GRSLF is a better buy in the short-term than EMX.

Price Growth

EMX (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +8.25% price change this week, while GRSLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +30.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +5.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +42.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +308.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

EMX is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+5.57% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMX($501M) has a higher market cap than GRSLF($106M). EMX has higher P/E ratio than GRSLF: EMX (91.80) vs GRSLF (4.77). EMX YTD gains are higher at: 165.318 vs. GRSLF (119.409). EMX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 18.4M vs. GRSLF (-8.27M). EMX has more cash in the bank: 23.4M vs. GRSLF (2.12M). EMX has higher revenues than GRSLF: EMX (26.6M) vs GRSLF (0).
EMXGRSLFEMX / GRSLF
Capitalization501M106M473%
EBITDA18.4M-8.27M-223%
Gain YTD165.318119.409138%
P/E Ratio91.804.771,924%
Revenue26.6M0-
Total Cash23.4M2.12M1,102%
Total Debt24.6MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMX vs GRSLF: Fundamental Ratings
EMX
GRSLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2521
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
52100
SMR RATING
1..100
879
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3636
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1599
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GRSLF's Valuation (74) in the null industry is in the same range as EMX (87). This means that GRSLF’s stock grew similarly to EMX’s over the last 12 months.

EMX's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRSLF (100). This means that EMX’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRSLF’s over the last 12 months.

GRSLF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EMX (87). This means that GRSLF’s stock grew significantly faster than EMX’s over the last 12 months.

GRSLF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as EMX (36). This means that GRSLF’s stock grew similarly to EMX’s over the last 12 months.

EMX's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GRSLF (99). This means that EMX’s stock grew significantly faster than GRSLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMXGRSLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRSLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CIIHY34.07N/A
N/A
Citic Securities Co., Ltd.
PPTDF11.81N/A
N/A
Peptidream, Inc.
QBCAF31.95N/A
N/A
Quebecor Inc.
CVWFF0.75N/A
N/A
CVW SUSTAINABLE ROYALTIES INC.
TRUFF0.03N/A
-13.49%
Red Light Holland Corp.

EMX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMX has been loosely correlated with SKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMX jumps, then SKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMX
1D Price
Change %
EMX100%
+4.56%
SKE - EMX
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
VZLA - EMX
51%
Loosely correlated
+4.09%
AAGFF - EMX
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
IVPAF - EMX
41%
Loosely correlated
-4.17%
GRSLF - EMX
40%
Loosely correlated
+9.95%
More

GRSLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRSLF has been loosely correlated with AAGFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GRSLF jumps, then AAGFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRSLF
1D Price
Change %
GRSLF100%
+9.95%
AAGFF - GRSLF
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
AGXPF - GRSLF
45%
Loosely correlated
+4.23%
TECK - GRSLF
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
EMX - GRSLF
40%
Loosely correlated
+4.56%
VZLA - GRSLF
36%
Loosely correlated
+4.09%
More