EMX
Price
$4.08
Change
+$0.26 (+6.81%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
445.14M
63 days until earnings call
IVPAF
Price
$8.81
Change
-$0.22 (-2.44%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
12.27B
73 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMX vs IVPAF

Header iconEMX vs IVPAF Comparison
Open Charts EMX vs IVPAFBanner chart's image
EMX Royalty
Price$4.08
Change+$0.26 (+6.81%)
Volume$43.46K
Capitalization445.14M
Ivanhoe Mines
Price$8.81
Change-$0.22 (-2.44%)
Volume$451.95K
Capitalization12.27B
EMX vs IVPAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IVPAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMX vs. IVPAF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMX is a Buy and IVPAF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (EMX: $3.82 vs. IVPAF: $9.06)
Brand notoriety: EMX and IVPAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMX: 214% vs. IVPAF: 33%
Market capitalization -- EMX: $445.14M vs. IVPAF: $12.27B
EMX [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $445.14M. IVPAF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $12.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIVPAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EMX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IVPAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EMX is a better buy in the long-term than IVPAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IVPAF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • IVPAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IVPAF is a better buy in the short-term than EMX.

Price Growth

EMX (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +7.30% price change this week, while IVPAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +2.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

EMX is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2025.

IVPAF is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.77% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IVPAF($12.3B) has a higher market cap than EMX($445M). EMX has higher P/E ratio than IVPAF: EMX (76.40) vs IVPAF (31.24). EMX YTD gains are higher at: 120.809 vs. IVPAF (-23.480). IVPAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 355M vs. EMX (18.4M). IVPAF has more cash in the bank: 655M vs. EMX (23.4M). EMX has less debt than IVPAF: EMX (24.6M) vs IVPAF (1.17B). IVPAF has higher revenues than EMX: IVPAF (215M) vs EMX (26.6M).
EMXIVPAFEMX / IVPAF
Capitalization445M12.3B4%
EBITDA18.4M355M5%
Gain YTD120.809-23.480-515%
P/E Ratio76.4031.24245%
Revenue26.6M215M12%
Total Cash23.4M655M4%
Total Debt24.6M1.17B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMX vs IVPAF: Fundamental Ratings
EMX
IVPAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2423
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7060
SMR RATING
1..100
8677
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3554
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2998
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMX's Valuation (85) in the null industry is in the same range as IVPAF (91). This means that EMX’s stock grew similarly to IVPAF’s over the last 12 months.

IVPAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as EMX (70). This means that IVPAF’s stock grew similarly to EMX’s over the last 12 months.

IVPAF's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as EMX (86). This means that IVPAF’s stock grew similarly to EMX’s over the last 12 months.

EMX's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as IVPAF (54). This means that EMX’s stock grew similarly to IVPAF’s over the last 12 months.

EMX's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IVPAF (98). This means that EMX’s stock grew significantly faster than IVPAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMXIVPAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IVPAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TVC23.980.20
+0.84%
Tennessee Valley Authority Power Bonds 1998 Series D due June 1 2028
CCIF5.650.03
+0.53%
Carlyle Credit Income Fund
TECL101.400.21
+0.21%
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X ETF
FLCA44.09-0.04
-0.08%
Franklin FTSE Canada ETF
EPV25.56-0.26
-1.00%
ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe

EMX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMX has been loosely correlated with SKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMX jumps, then SKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMX
1D Price
Change %
EMX100%
-2.05%
SKE - EMX
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.28%
VZLA - EMX
52%
Loosely correlated
-3.98%
AAGFF - EMX
47%
Loosely correlated
-7.15%
IVPAF - EMX
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.44%
GRSLF - EMX
40%
Loosely correlated
-11.13%
More