Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMXC vs QLVE
EMXC vs QLVE Comparison
Open Charts EMXC vs QLVE
iShares MSCI Emerging Mkts ex China ETF
Price$69.53
Change-$0.02 (-0.03%)
Volume$5.44K
Net Assets13.01B
FlexShares EMs Quality Lw Vol ETF
Price$29.12
Change-$0.45 (-1.52%)
Volume$287
Net Assets14.73M
EMXC vs QLVE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMXC vs. QLVE commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMXC is a Hold and QLVE is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMXC has more net assets: 13B vs. QLVE (14.7M). EMXC has a higher annual dividend yield than QLVE: EMXC (26.901) vs QLVE (18.923). EMXC was incepted earlier than QLVE: EMXC (8 years) vs QLVE (6 years). QLVE (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than EMXC (0.25). QLVE has a higher turnover EMXC (12.00) vs EMXC (12.00).
| EMXC | QLVE | EMXC / QLVE | |
| Gain YTD | 26.901 | 18.923 | 142% |
| Net Assets | 13B | 14.7M | 88,435% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.18 | 139% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 96.00 | 13% |
| Yield | 2.37 | 3.38 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EMXC | QLVE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 82% | 26 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 22 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
EMXC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMXC has been loosely correlated with TEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMXC jumps, then TEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMXC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMXC | 100% | -1.21% | ||
| TEL - EMXC | 63% Loosely correlated | -7.96% | ||
| CLS - EMXC | 57% Loosely correlated | -9.66% | ||
| OUT - EMXC | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| LTM - EMXC | 51% Loosely correlated | -3.62% | ||
| NU - EMXC | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.17% | ||
More | ||||
QLVE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that QLVE and BIDU have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QLVE and BIDU's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLVE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLVE | 100% | -1.53% | ||
| BIDU - QLVE | 9% Poorly correlated | -4.36% | ||
| PDD - QLVE | 6% Poorly correlated | -4.31% | ||
| ZTO - QLVE | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.11% | ||
| JD - QLVE | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.78% | ||
| AMR - QLVE | 4% Poorly correlated | -3.52% | ||
More | ||||