EMYB
Price
$15.94
Change
-$0.06 (-0.38%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
114.56M
FSRL
Price
$9.90
Change
-$0.10 (-1.00%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
25.51M
86 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMYB vs FSRL

Header iconEMYB vs FSRL Comparison
Open Charts EMYB vs FSRLBanner chart's image
Embassy Ban
Price$15.94
Change-$0.06 (-0.38%)
Volume$8.74K
Capitalization114.56M
First Reliance Bancshares
Price$9.90
Change-$0.10 (-1.00%)
Volume$500
Capitalization25.51M
EMYB vs FSRL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMYB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSRL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMYB vs. FSRL commentary
Aug 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMYB is a Hold and FSRL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 05, 2025
Stock price -- (EMYB: $15.94 vs. FSRL: $9.90)
Brand notoriety: EMYB and FSRL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMYB: 153% vs. FSRL: 18%
Market capitalization -- EMYB: $114.56M vs. FSRL: $25.51M
EMYB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $114.56M. FSRL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $25.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMYB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFSRL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EMYB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FSRL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSRL is a better buy in the long-term than EMYB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMYB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSRL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMYB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FSRL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSRL is a better buy in the short-term than EMYB.

Price Growth

EMYB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.99% price change this week, while FSRL (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

EMYB is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

FSRL is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.37% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMYB($115M) has a higher market cap than FSRL($25.5M). FSRL has higher P/E ratio than EMYB: FSRL (11.85) vs EMYB (6.62). FSRL YTD gains are higher at: 3.233 vs. EMYB (-1.081). EMYB has less debt than FSRL: EMYB (14.7M) vs FSRL (35.3M). EMYB has higher revenues than FSRL: EMYB (48.5M) vs FSRL (22.5M).
EMYBFSRLEMYB / FSRL
Capitalization115M25.5M451%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.0813.233-33%
P/E Ratio6.6211.8556%
Revenue48.5M22.5M216%
Total Cash22.9MN/A-
Total Debt14.7M35.3M42%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMYB vs FSRL: Fundamental Ratings
EMYB
FSRL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5341
SMR RATING
1..100
505
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5152
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3338
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMYB's Valuation (57) in the null industry is in the same range as FSRL (58). This means that EMYB’s stock grew similarly to FSRL’s over the last 12 months.

FSRL's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as EMYB (53). This means that FSRL’s stock grew similarly to EMYB’s over the last 12 months.

FSRL's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EMYB (50). This means that FSRL’s stock grew somewhat faster than EMYB’s over the last 12 months.

EMYB's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as FSRL (52). This means that EMYB’s stock grew similarly to FSRL’s over the last 12 months.

EMYB's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as FSRL (38). This means that EMYB’s stock grew similarly to FSRL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMYBFSRL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
39%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
29%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMYB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSRL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMOFF0.13N/A
+1.25%
SONORO GOLD CORP.
ESLOF298.581.58
+0.53%
EssilorLuxottica
TSHTY9.91N/A
N/A
Toshiba Tec Corp.
IDDWF26.45N/A
N/A
Indutrade AB
EMYB15.94-0.06
-0.38%
Embassy Bancorp Inc.

EMYB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMYB and SQCF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMYB and SQCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMYB
1D Price
Change %
EMYB100%
-0.38%
SQCF - EMYB
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
SLRK - EMYB
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
FSRL - EMYB
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STBI - EMYB
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.59%
HTBK - EMYB
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FSRL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FSRL and KTHAF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FSRL and KTHAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSRL
1D Price
Change %
FSRL100%
N/A
KTHAF - FSRL
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BXRBF - FSRL
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMYB - FSRL
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
CHBH - FSRL
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLGF - FSRL
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.57%
More