EMYB
Price
$16.00
Change
+$0.01 (+0.06%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
114.56M
FSRL
Price
$9.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
25.51M
5 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EMYB vs FSRL

Header iconEMYB vs FSRL Comparison
Open Charts EMYB vs FSRLBanner chart's image
Embassy Ban
Price$16.00
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
Volume$500
Capitalization114.56M
First Reliance Bancshares
Price$9.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6.32K
Capitalization25.51M
EMYB vs FSRL Comparison Chart
Loading...
EMYB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSRL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMYB vs. FSRL commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMYB is a Hold and FSRL is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (EMYB: $16.00 vs. FSRL: $9.50)
Brand notoriety: EMYB and FSRL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMYB: 4% vs. FSRL: 39%
Market capitalization -- EMYB: $114.56M vs. FSRL: $25.51M
EMYB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $114.56M. FSRL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $25.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMYB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFSRL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EMYB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FSRL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSRL is a better buy in the long-term than EMYB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMYB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSRL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMYB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FSRL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSRL is a better buy in the short-term than EMYB.

Price Growth

EMYB (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FSRL (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

EMYB is expected to report earnings on Mar 17, 2023.

FSRL is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMYB($115M) has a higher market cap than FSRL($25.5M). FSRL has higher P/E ratio than EMYB: FSRL (11.85) vs EMYB (6.62). FSRL YTD gains are higher at: -0.938 vs. EMYB (-3.614). EMYB has less debt than FSRL: EMYB (14.7M) vs FSRL (35.3M). EMYB has higher revenues than FSRL: EMYB (48.5M) vs FSRL (22.5M).
EMYBFSRLEMYB / FSRL
Capitalization115M25.5M451%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-3.614-0.938385%
P/E Ratio6.6211.8556%
Revenue48.5M22.5M216%
Total Cash22.9MN/A-
Total Debt14.7M35.3M42%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMYB vs FSRL: Fundamental Ratings
EMYB
FSRL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10063
SMR RATING
1..100
516
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5150
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2155
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSRL's Valuation (52) in the null industry is in the same range as EMYB (55). This means that FSRL’s stock grew similarly to EMYB’s over the last 12 months.

FSRL's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EMYB (100). This means that FSRL’s stock grew somewhat faster than EMYB’s over the last 12 months.

FSRL's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EMYB (51). This means that FSRL’s stock grew somewhat faster than EMYB’s over the last 12 months.

FSRL's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as EMYB (51). This means that FSRL’s stock grew similarly to EMYB’s over the last 12 months.

EMYB's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSRL (55). This means that EMYB’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSRL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMYBFSRL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
31%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
46%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
28%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EMYB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSRL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TNA44.010.50
+1.15%
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X ETF
NUDM30.530.16
+0.53%
Nuveen ESG Intl Dev Mkts Eq ETF
FBL35.750.16
+0.45%
GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF
HYXU46.59N/A
N/A
iShares International High Yield Bd ETF
KROP10.03-0.01
-0.10%
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF

EMYB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMYB and SQCF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMYB and SQCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMYB
1D Price
Change %
EMYB100%
N/A
SQCF - EMYB
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
SLRK - EMYB
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
FSRL - EMYB
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STBI - EMYB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HTBK - EMYB
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FSRL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FSRL and KTHAF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FSRL and KTHAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSRL
1D Price
Change %
FSRL100%
N/A
KTHAF - FSRL
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BXRBF - FSRL
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMYB - FSRL
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBH - FSRL
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLGF - FSRL
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
More