Ad is loading...
EMYB
Price
$16.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
HTBK
Price
$10.65
Change
-$0.02 (-0.19%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
68 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EMYB vs HTBK

Header iconEMYB vs HTBK Comparison
Open Charts EMYB vs HTBKBanner chart's image
Embassy Ban
Price$16.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$13.39K
CapitalizationN/A
Heritage Commerce
Price$10.65
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
Volume$228.28K
CapitalizationN/A
EMYB vs HTBK Comparison Chart
Loading...
HTBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMYB vs. HTBK commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMYB is a Hold and HTBK is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (EMYB: $16.25 vs. HTBK: $10.65)
Brand notoriety: EMYB and HTBK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMYB: 816% vs. HTBK: 68%
Market capitalization -- EMYB: $114.56M vs. HTBK: $524.83M
EMYB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $114.56M. HTBK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $524.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMYB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHTBK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EMYB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HTBK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EMYB and HTBK are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HTBK’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HTBK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

EMYB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.52% price change this week, while HTBK (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

EMYB is expected to report earnings on Mar 17, 2023.

HTBK is expected to report earnings on Jan 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.40% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HTBK($525M) has a higher market cap than EMYB($115M). HTBK has higher P/E ratio than EMYB: HTBK (8.01) vs EMYB (6.62). EMYB (14.141) and HTBK (13.672) have similar YTD gains . HTBK has more cash in the bank: 40.1M vs. EMYB (22.9M). EMYB has less debt than HTBK: EMYB (14.7M) vs HTBK (39.5M). HTBK has higher revenues than EMYB: HTBK (192M) vs EMYB (48.5M).
EMYBHTBKEMYB / HTBK
Capitalization115M525M22%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.14113.672103%
P/E Ratio6.628.0183%
Revenue48.5M192M25%
Total Cash22.9M40.1M57%
Total Debt14.7M39.5M37%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMYB vs HTBK: Fundamental Ratings
EMYB
HTBK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5017
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8070
SMR RATING
1..100
4923
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4542
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2913
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HTBK's Valuation (56) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EMYB (62) in the null industry. This means that HTBK’s stock grew similarly to EMYB’s over the last 12 months.

HTBK's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EMYB (80) in the null industry. This means that HTBK’s stock grew similarly to EMYB’s over the last 12 months.

HTBK's SMR Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EMYB (49) in the null industry. This means that HTBK’s stock grew similarly to EMYB’s over the last 12 months.

HTBK's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EMYB (45) in the null industry. This means that HTBK’s stock grew similarly to EMYB’s over the last 12 months.

HTBK's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EMYB (29) in the null industry. This means that HTBK’s stock grew similarly to EMYB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HTBK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HTBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STE220.12-1.07
-0.48%
STERIS plc
IONR5.05-0.29
-5.43%
ioneer Ltd
RSKD4.34-0.29
-6.26%
Riskified Ltd
ACLS73.22-5.63
-7.14%
Axcelis Technologies
SBEV0.18-0.02
-8.02%
Splash Beverage Group

EMYB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMYB and SQCF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMYB and SQCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMYB
1D Price
Change %
EMYB100%
N/A
SQCF - EMYB
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.46%
SLRK - EMYB
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.43%
FSRL - EMYB
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STBI - EMYB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HTBK - EMYB
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
More

HTBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HTBK has been closely correlated with FFBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HTBK jumps, then FFBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HTBK
1D Price
Change %
HTBK100%
-0.19%
FFBC - HTBK
88%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
UBSI - HTBK
87%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
BY - HTBK
87%
Closely correlated
-0.99%
BUSE - HTBK
87%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
SHBI - HTBK
87%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
More