ENADF
Price
$1.39
Change
+$0.02 (+1.46%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
245.97M
RMDEF
Price
$20.27
Change
+$5.03 (+33.01%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
371.42M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ENADF vs RMDEF

Header iconENADF vs RMDEF Comparison
Open Charts ENADF vs RMDEFBanner chart's image
Enad Global 7 AB
Price$1.39
Change+$0.02 (+1.46%)
Volume$500
Capitalization245.97M
REMEDY ENTMT OYJ
Price$20.27
Change+$5.03 (+33.01%)
Volume$258
Capitalization371.42M
ENADF vs RMDEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ENADF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ENADF vs. RMDEF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ENADF is a Buy and RMDEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (ENADF: $1.39 vs. RMDEF: $20.27)
Brand notoriety: ENADF and RMDEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ENADF: 12% vs. RMDEF: 106%
Market capitalization -- ENADF: $245.97M vs. RMDEF: $371.42M
ENADF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $245.97M. RMDEF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $371.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ENADF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRMDEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ENADF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RMDEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ENADF is a better buy in the long-term than RMDEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ENADF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ENADF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

ENADF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RMDEF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.43%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+4.19% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMDEF($371M) has a higher market cap than ENADF($246M). RMDEF has higher P/E ratio than ENADF: RMDEF (26.11) vs ENADF (18.45). ENADF YTD gains are higher at: 18.556 vs. RMDEF (1.350). ENADF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 576M vs. RMDEF (1.46M). ENADF has more cash in the bank: 453M vs. RMDEF (49M). RMDEF has less debt than ENADF: RMDEF (2.99M) vs ENADF (458M). ENADF has higher revenues than RMDEF: ENADF (2.05B) vs RMDEF (43.6M).
ENADFRMDEFENADF / RMDEF
Capitalization246M371M66%
EBITDA576M1.46M39,344%
Gain YTD18.5561.3501,374%
P/E Ratio18.4526.1171%
Revenue2.05B43.6M4,702%
Total Cash453M49M924%
Total Debt458M2.99M15,307%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ENADFRMDEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ENADF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSMVX41.41N/A
N/A
Congress Small Cap Growth Retail
AMIGX84.21N/A
N/A
Amana Growth Institutional
RPGIX22.23N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Global Industrials
FLXSX16.07N/A
N/A
Fidelity Flex Small Cap Index
EAMAX18.17N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Emerging Markets Equity A

ENADF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ENADF and NICE have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ENADF and NICE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ENADF
1D Price
Change %
ENADF100%
N/A
NICE - ENADF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
REKR - ENADF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.50%
SGPYY - ENADF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
EB - ENADF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
GENTF - ENADF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RMDEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMDEF and ARBE have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMDEF and ARBE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMDEF
1D Price
Change %
RMDEF100%
N/A
ARBE - RMDEF
0%
Poorly correlated
-1.13%
NWKLF - RMDEF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IARGF - RMDEF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMTEF - RMDEF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ENADF - RMDEF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More