ENADF
Price
$1.24
Change
-$0.22 (-15.07%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
122.2M
SGPYY
Price
$59.11
Change
+$0.16 (+0.27%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
14.11B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ENADF vs SGPYY

Header iconENADF vs SGPYY Comparison
Open Charts ENADF vs SGPYYBanner chart's image
Enad Global 7 AB
Price$1.24
Change-$0.22 (-15.07%)
Volume$500
Capitalization122.2M
Sage Group plc (The)
Price$59.11
Change+$0.16 (+0.27%)
Volume$19.88K
Capitalization14.11B
ENADF vs SGPYY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ENADF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGPYY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ENADF vs. SGPYY commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ENADF is a Hold and SGPYY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (ENADF: $1.24 vs. SGPYY: $59.11)
Brand notoriety: ENADF and SGPYY are both not notable
ENADF represents the Electronics/Appliances, while SGPYY is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ENADF: 27% vs. SGPYY: 31%
Market capitalization -- ENADF: $122.2M vs. SGPYY: $14.11B
ENADF [@Electronics/Appliances] is valued at $122.2M. SGPYY’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $14.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry ranges from $403.7B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $324.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry is $12.69B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ENADF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSGPYY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ENADF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SGPYY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SGPYY is a better buy in the long-term than ENADF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ENADF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SGPYY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ENADF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SGPYY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SGPYY is a better buy in the short-term than ENADF.

Price Growth

ENADF (@Electronics/Appliances) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SGPYY (@Packaged Software) price change was -5.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was -1.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.90%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.47%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronics/Appliances (-1.65% weekly)

TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.

@Packaged Software (+0.47% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGPYY($14.1B) has a higher market cap than ENADF($122M). ENADF has higher P/E ratio than SGPYY: ENADF (288.35) vs SGPYY (31.64). ENADF YTD gains are higher at: 5.983 vs. SGPYY (-5.517). SGPYY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 598M vs. ENADF (412M). ENADF (579M) and SGPYY (574M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . ENADF has less debt than SGPYY: ENADF (402M) vs SGPYY (1.55B). SGPYY has higher revenues than ENADF: SGPYY (2.42B) vs ENADF (1.93B).
ENADFSGPYYENADF / SGPYY
Capitalization122M14.1B1%
EBITDA412M598M69%
Gain YTD5.983-5.517-108%
P/E Ratio288.3531.64911%
Revenue1.93B2.42B80%
Total Cash579M574M101%
Total Debt402M1.55B26%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SGPYY: Fundamental Ratings
SGPYY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
28
SMR RATING
1..100
29
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ENADFSGPYY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ENADF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGPYY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PBSV0.600.09
+17.36%
Pharma-Bio Serv, Inc.
TTFNF62.921.14
+1.85%
TotalEnergies SE
LGDTF0.26N/A
+1.34%
Liberty Gold Corp
TMVWY5.220.03
+0.58%
TeamViewer SE
KIKOY18.64N/A
N/A
Kikkoman Corp.

ENADF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ENADF and NICE have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ENADF and NICE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ENADF
1D Price
Change %
ENADF100%
N/A
NICE - ENADF
25%
Poorly correlated
+4.15%
REKR - ENADF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.70%
SGPYY - ENADF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
EB - ENADF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
GENTF - ENADF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SGPYY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGPYY has been loosely correlated with SAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGPYY jumps, then SAP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGPYY
1D Price
Change %
SGPYY100%
+0.27%
SAP - SGPYY
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
INTU - SGPYY
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
SNPS - SGPYY
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
MSFT - SGPYY
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
PTC - SGPYY
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
More