It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ENB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMMLP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ENB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMLP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
ENB (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -1.29% price change this week, while MMLP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +0.25% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.14%.
ENB is expected to report earnings on Feb 07, 2025.
MMLP is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
ENB | MMLP | ENB / MMLP | |
Capitalization | 76.6B | 98.3M | 77,925% |
EBITDA | 16.3B | 108M | 15,093% |
Gain YTD | 14.853 | 68.221 | 22% |
P/E Ratio | 17.05 | 138.89 | 12% |
Revenue | 43.6B | 798M | 5,464% |
Total Cash | 5.9B | 54K | 10,927,778% |
Total Debt | 81.2B | 482M | 16,846% |
ENB | MMLP | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 93 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 66 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 24 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 36 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ENB's Valuation (15) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MMLP (76). This means that ENB’s stock grew somewhat faster than MMLP’s over the last 12 months.
ENB's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as MMLP (93). This means that ENB’s stock grew similarly to MMLP’s over the last 12 months.
ENB's SMR Rating (66) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MMLP (100). This means that ENB’s stock grew somewhat faster than MMLP’s over the last 12 months.
MMLP's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as ENB (49). This means that MMLP’s stock grew similarly to ENB’s over the last 12 months.
MMLP's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as ENB (28). This means that MMLP’s stock grew similarly to ENB’s over the last 12 months.
ENB | MMLP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago61% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago55% | 4 days ago79% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago55% | 4 days ago73% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago51% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago53% | 4 days ago76% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago52% | 4 days ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago55% | 12 days ago78% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago52% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago56% | 4 days ago80% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago47% | 4 days ago76% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that MMLP and HYTLF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MMLP and HYTLF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MMLP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MMLP | 100% | +0.25% | ||
HYTLF - MMLP | 27% Poorly correlated | -12.50% | ||
MPLX - MMLP | 22% Poorly correlated | +2.47% | ||
DTM - MMLP | 22% Poorly correlated | +3.47% | ||
ENB - MMLP | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.62% | ||
WMB - MMLP | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.75% | ||
More |