ENBP
Price
$20.04
Change
-$0.09 (-0.45%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
114.41M
FBAK
Price
$271.75
Change
-$1.00 (-0.37%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
863.77M
20 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ENBP vs FBAK

Header iconENBP vs FBAK Comparison
Open Charts ENBP vs FBAKBanner chart's image
ENB Financial
Price$20.04
Change-$0.09 (-0.45%)
Volume$200
Capitalization114.41M
First National Bank Alaska
Price$271.75
Change-$1.00 (-0.37%)
Volume$39
Capitalization863.77M
ENBP vs FBAK Comparison Chart in %
ENBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FBAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ENBP vs. FBAK commentary
Oct 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ENBP is a Buy and FBAK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 10, 2025
Stock price -- (ENBP: $20.04 vs. FBAK: $271.75)
Brand notoriety: ENBP and FBAK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ENBP: 14% vs. FBAK: 12%
Market capitalization -- ENBP: $114.41M vs. FBAK: $863.77M
ENBP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $114.41M. FBAK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $863.77M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $169.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ENBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFBAK’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ENBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FBAK’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, ENBP is a better buy in the long-term than FBAK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ENBP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FBAK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ENBP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FBAK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FBAK is a better buy in the short-term than ENBP.

Price Growth

ENBP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.22% price change this week, while FBAK (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

FBAK is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.81% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBAK($864M) has a higher market cap than ENBP($114M). FBAK has higher P/E ratio than ENBP: FBAK (14.33) vs ENBP (6.59). FBAK YTD gains are higher at: 22.188 vs. ENBP (20.199). FBAK has more cash in the bank: 87.3M vs. ENBP (6.85M). FBAK has less debt than ENBP: FBAK (15M) vs ENBP (176M). FBAK has higher revenues than ENBP: FBAK (179M) vs ENBP (80.2M).
ENBPFBAKENBP / FBAK
Capitalization114M864M13%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD20.19922.18891%
P/E Ratio6.5914.3346%
Revenue80.2M179M45%
Total Cash6.85M87.3M8%
Total Debt176M15M1,173%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ENBP vs FBAK: Fundamental Ratings
ENBP
FBAK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3274
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6620
SMR RATING
1..100
4531
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4748
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3721
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6517

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ENBP's Valuation (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FBAK (92). This means that ENBP’s stock grew significantly faster than FBAK’s over the last 12 months.

FBAK's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ENBP (66). This means that FBAK’s stock grew somewhat faster than ENBP’s over the last 12 months.

FBAK's SMR Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as ENBP (45). This means that FBAK’s stock grew similarly to ENBP’s over the last 12 months.

ENBP's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as FBAK (48). This means that ENBP’s stock grew similarly to FBAK’s over the last 12 months.

FBAK's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as ENBP (37). This means that FBAK’s stock grew similarly to ENBP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ENBPFBAK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
37%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
27%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ENBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FBAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QEPC37.970.87
+2.35%
Q.E.P. Co., Inc.
BZLYF12.430.13
+1.02%
Beazley Plc
BMNM1.25N/A
N/A
Bimini Capital Management, Inc.
YNNHF1.70N/A
N/A
Yihai Intl Hldg Ltd.
MITSF25.20-0.05
-0.20%
Mitsui & Co., Ltd.

ENBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ENBP and USCB have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ENBP and USCB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ENBP
1D Price
Change %
ENBP100%
-0.44%
USCB - ENBP
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.17%
TSBK - ENBP
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
FBAK - ENBP
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
EGFEY - ENBP
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
ESBS - ENBP
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
More

FBAK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBAK and SGBG have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBAK and SGBG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBAK
1D Price
Change %
FBAK100%
-0.37%
SGBG - FBAK
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ENBP - FBAK
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
EGFEF - FBAK
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCNCB - FBAK
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.56%
FBPA - FBAK
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.73%
More