Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ENFR vs MLPA
ENFR vs MLPA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ENFR vs. MLPA commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ENFR is a StrongBuy and MLPA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPA has more net assets: 1.81B vs. ENFR (323M). ENFR has a higher annual dividend yield than MLPA: ENFR (7.697) vs MLPA (2.970). ENFR was incepted earlier than MLPA: ENFR (12 years) vs MLPA (13 years). ENFR (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than MLPA (0.45). ENFR has a higher turnover MLPA (28.89) vs MLPA (28.89).
| ENFR | MLPA | ENFR / MLPA | |
| Gain YTD | 7.697 | 2.970 | 259% |
| Net Assets | 323M | 1.81B | 18% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.45 | 78% |
| Turnover | 33.00 | 28.89 | 114% |
| Yield | 4.53 | 7.66 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ENFR | MLPA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 88% | 10 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ENFR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ENFR has been closely correlated with OKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ENFR jumps, then OKE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ENFR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENFR | 100% | +0.90% | ||
| OKE - ENFR | 87% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| WMB - ENFR | 85% Closely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| TRGP - ENFR | 84% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| KMI - ENFR | 84% Closely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| ET - ENFR | 83% Closely correlated | -0.71% | ||
More | ||||
MLPA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLPA has been closely correlated with ET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MLPA jumps, then ET could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MLPA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLPA | 100% | -0.19% | ||
| ET - MLPA | 80% Closely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| EPD - MLPA | 77% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| USAC - MLPA | 77% Closely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| MPLX - MLPA | 77% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| PAA - MLPA | 76% Closely correlated | -0.77% | ||
More | ||||