Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ENHNX vs GSFPX
ENHNX vs GSFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ENHNX vs. GSFPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ENHNX is a Hold and GSFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSFPX has more cash in the bank: 3.69B vs. ENHNX (140M). ENHNX pays higher dividends than GSFPX: ENHNX (6.13) vs GSFPX (1.11). ENHNX was incepted earlier than GSFPX: ENHNX (10 years) vs GSFPX (8 years). ENHNX (1.25) is less costly to investors than GSFPX (0.74). ENHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 150.00 vs. GSFPX (23.00). GSFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than ENHNX: GSFPX (0) vs ENHNX (1000000). GSFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.64 vs. ENHNX (-1.65). GSFPX return over 5 years is better than : 38.28 vs. ENHNX (36.17).
| ENHNX | GSFPX | ENHNX / GSFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.68 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.74 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.397 | 11.009 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 140M | 3.69B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.13 | 1.11 | 551% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.65 | 5.64 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.34 | 38.46 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.17 | 38.28 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers