Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ENHRX vs GSFPX
ENHRX vs GSFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ENHRX vs. GSFPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ENHRX is a Hold and GSFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSFPX has more cash in the bank: 3.66B vs. ENHRX (140M). ENHRX pays higher dividends than GSFPX: ENHRX (5.93) vs GSFPX (1.11). ENHRX was incepted earlier than GSFPX: ENHRX (10 years) vs GSFPX (8 years). ENHRX (1.50) is less costly to investors than GSFPX (0.74). ENHRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 150.00 vs. GSFPX (23.00). GSFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than ENHRX: GSFPX (0) vs ENHRX (1000). GSFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.61 vs. ENHRX (-0.98). GSFPX return over 5 years is better than : 37.89 vs. ENHRX (35.55).
| ENHRX | GSFPX | ENHRX / GSFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.68 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.74 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.646 | 10.237 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 140M | 3.66B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.93 | 1.11 | 533% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.98 | 4.61 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.02 | 37.49 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.55 | 37.89 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement