Advertisement
ENPH vs ICLN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ENPH is a Hold and ICLN is a Hold.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ENPH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- ENPH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
ENPH | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 3 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ENPH | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 3 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 5 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 84% | 9 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 90% |
Advertisement
ENPH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ENPH has been closely correlated with SEDG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ENPH jumps, then SEDG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ENPH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENPH | 100% | N/A | ||
| SEDG - ENPH | 78% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| RUN - ENPH | 71% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| FSLR - ENPH | 63% Loosely correlated | -4.30% | ||
| NOVA - ENPH | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| CSIQ - ENPH | 59% Loosely correlated | -6.48% | ||
More | ||||
ICLN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICLN has been closely correlated with FSLR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICLN jumps, then FSLR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICLN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICLN | 100% | -2.50% | ||
| FSLR - ICLN | 75% Closely correlated | -4.30% | ||
| RUN - ICLN | 72% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| ENPH - ICLN | 70% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CSIQ - ICLN | 69% Closely correlated | -6.48% | ||
| FCEL - ICLN | 68% Closely correlated | +8.53% | ||
More | ||||