ENPH vs IQM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ENPH is a Buy and IQM is a StrongBuy.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ENPH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- ENPH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
ENPH | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ENPH | IQM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 24 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 24 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 24 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 24 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 86% | 26 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 30 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | N/A |
IQM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IQM has been loosely correlated with WOLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IQM jumps, then WOLF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IQM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IQM | 100% | +2.31% | ||
| WOLF - IQM | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.50% | ||
| RUN - IQM | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.32% | ||
| TEAM - IQM | 6% Poorly correlated | -1.61% | ||
| ENPH - IQM | 6% Poorly correlated | +1.94% | ||
| SEDG - IQM | 5% Poorly correlated | +2.70% | ||
More | ||||