ENPH vs QCLN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ENPH is a Hold and QCLN is a Hold.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ENPH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- ENPH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
ENPH | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 77 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 66 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ENPH | QCLN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 7 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 88% |
ENPH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ENPH has been closely correlated with SEDG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ENPH jumps, then SEDG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ENPH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENPH | 100% | -6.36% | ||
| SEDG - ENPH | 78% Closely correlated | -17.07% | ||
| RUN - ENPH | 71% Closely correlated | -9.35% | ||
| FSLR - ENPH | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.40% | ||
| NOVA - ENPH | 62% Loosely correlated | -6.95% | ||
| CSIQ - ENPH | 59% Loosely correlated | -6.63% | ||
More | ||||
QCLN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCLN has been closely correlated with FLNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QCLN jumps, then FLNC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QCLN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCLN | 100% | -1.09% | ||
| FLNC - QCLN | 73% Closely correlated | -7.95% | ||
| RUN - QCLN | 72% Closely correlated | -9.35% | ||
| ENPH - QCLN | 72% Closely correlated | -6.36% | ||
| AEIS - QCLN | 72% Closely correlated | -2.41% | ||
| BLDP - QCLN | 72% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
More | ||||