Entegris (ENTG) and Microchip Technology (MCHP) represent two distinct segments of the semiconductor value chain, making them relevant for investors seeking comparative insights into materials science versus component manufacturing. Traders and portfolio managers monitoring technology sector rotation, supply-chain resilience, and relative momentum often examine such pairings to assess positioning within the broader electronics ecosystem. This comparison highlights observable differences in business models, recent price behavior, and market positioning without forecasting future outcomes.
Entegris (ENTG) provides advanced materials and process solutions, including chemical mechanical planarization slurries, specialty gases, and filtration systems, primarily serving semiconductor fabrication. The company reported solid first-quarter 2026 results with net sales of $812 million, reflecting a 5% year-over-year increase driven by higher volumes in advanced manufacturing processes. In recent market activity, ENTG shares demonstrated strong upward momentum through mid-2026 before experiencing a pullback from June highs near $184 toward approximately $129 by late July. Upcoming second-quarter earnings on August 4, 2026, and a declared quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share have contributed to ongoing investor attention on the stock’s valuation and operational execution.
Microchip Technology (MCHP) designs and manufactures microcontrollers, mixed-signal integrated circuits, and analog semiconductors used in industrial, automotive, communications, and consumer applications. The company maintains a broad product portfolio serving diverse end markets, which can moderate the impact of single-segment cyclicality. In recent market activity, MCHP has exhibited more measured price movements relative to peers with higher-beta exposure, reflecting its diversified customer base and steady demand patterns across embedded systems. Broader semiconductor industry dynamics, including inventory adjustments and end-market spending, have influenced sentiment without the pronounced swings observed in certain materials suppliers during the same period.
Tickeron maintains a curated section of Trending AI Robots that highlights select AI trading bots from hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section. Available bots span a wide range of performance metrics, trading styles, timeframes, and ticker sets, with many showing varying win rates, drawdown profiles, and return ranges depending on strategy parameters. Readers interested in exploring these automated approaches can review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for additional details.
ENTG operates upstream in the semiconductor supply chain as a provider of critical materials and purity solutions, offering direct leverage to advanced-node production ramps, whereas MCHP delivers finished semiconductor components with exposure across multiple end markets including industrial automation and automotive electronics. Recent momentum has favored ENTG amid AI-related materials demand, while MCHP has displayed comparatively stable but less accelerated price behavior amid broader cyclical pressures. Risk factors differ as well: ENTG faces concentration in semiconductor capital spending cycles, while MCHP contends with inventory cycles and diversified but slower-growing industrial demand. Sector exposure places both within technology hardware, yet ENTG’s positioning aligns more closely with fabrication equipment trends and MCHP’s with system-level integration needs. Market sentiment in recent weeks has reflected these contrasts through differing volatility patterns and analyst focus.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in recent market activity, alignment with semiconductor process-node catalysts, and relative positioning within the materials segment, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a higher probabilistic weighting to ENTG over MCHP. This assessment draws from visible momentum patterns and earnings visibility rather than directional forecasts, and investors should conduct their own due diligence.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Disclaimers and LimitationsIt is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ENTG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCHP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ENTG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCHP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ENTG (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а -7.74% price change this week, while MCHP (@Semiconductors) price change was -5.80% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -2.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -21.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +42.97%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -2.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -18.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.18%.
ENTG is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
MCHP is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
@Semiconductors (-2.82% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| ENTG | MCHP | ENTG / MCHP | |
| Capitalization | 18.1B | 40.3B | 45% |
| EBITDA | 848M | 1.18B | 72% |
| Gain YTD | 41.641 | 17.863 | 233% |
| P/E Ratio | 68.82 | 337.68 | 20% |
| Revenue | 3.24B | 4.71B | 69% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 240M | - |
| Total Debt | 3.76B | 5.54B | 68% |
ENTG | MCHP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 96 | 90 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 81 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | 78 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ENTG's Valuation (65) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as MCHP (90) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that ENTG’s stock grew similarly to MCHP’s over the last 12 months.
MCHP's Profit vs Risk Rating (90) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as ENTG (96) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that MCHP’s stock grew similarly to ENTG’s over the last 12 months.
ENTG's SMR Rating (81) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as MCHP (90) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that ENTG’s stock grew similarly to MCHP’s over the last 12 months.
ENTG's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as MCHP (62) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that ENTG’s stock grew similarly to MCHP’s over the last 12 months.
ENTG's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCHP (78) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that ENTG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCHP’s over the last 12 months.
| ENTG | MCHP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 7 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 12 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 70% | 5 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 78% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ENTG has been closely correlated with LSCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ENTG jumps, then LSCC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ENTG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENTG | 100% | +1.66% | ||
| LSCC - ENTG | 78% Closely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| NXPI - ENTG | 77% Closely correlated | -6.53% | ||
| MCHP - ENTG | 77% Closely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| ON - ENTG | 76% Closely correlated | -2.54% | ||
| SLAB - ENTG | 76% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHP has been closely correlated with MCHPP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 97% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCHP jumps, then MCHPP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHP | 100% | -0.96% | ||
| MCHPP - MCHP | 97% Closely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| TXN - MCHP | 81% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| ADI - MCHP | 80% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| NXPI - MCHP | 80% Closely correlated | -6.53% | ||
| ON - MCHP | 76% Closely correlated | -2.54% | ||
More | ||||