Ad is loading...
EPAC
Price
$47.56
Change
-$0.55 (-1.14%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
30 days until earnings call
FLS
Price
$59.23
Change
+$0.04 (+0.07%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
100 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EPAC vs FLS

Header iconEPAC vs FLS Comparison
Open Charts EPAC vs FLSBanner chart's image
Enerpac Tool Group
Price$47.56
Change-$0.55 (-1.14%)
Volume$300.16K
CapitalizationN/A
Flowserve
Price$59.23
Change+$0.04 (+0.07%)
Volume$676.3K
CapitalizationN/A
EPAC vs FLS Comparison Chart
Loading...
EPAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EPAC vs. FLS commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EPAC is a Sell and FLS is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (EPAC: $47.56 vs. FLS: $59.23)
Brand notoriety: EPAC and FLS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EPAC: 82% vs. FLS: 49%
Market capitalization -- EPAC: $1.93B vs. FLS: $5.99B
EPAC [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $1.93B. FLS’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $5.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $135.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $9.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EPAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFLS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EPAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FLS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLS is a better buy in the long-term than EPAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EPAC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EPAC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FLS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLS is a better buy in the short-term than EPAC.

Price Growth

EPAC (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -6.56% price change this week, while FLS (@Industrial Machinery) price change was -1.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

EPAC is expected to report earnings on Dec 17, 2024.

FLS is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (-0.80% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLS($5.99B) has a higher market cap than EPAC($1.93B). FLS has higher P/E ratio than EPAC: FLS (32.38) vs EPAC (26.10). EPAC YTD gains are higher at: 53.119 vs. FLS (45.575). FLS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 374M vs. EPAC (128M). FLS has more cash in the bank: 546M vs. EPAC (154M). EPAC has less debt than FLS: EPAC (245M) vs FLS (1.41B). FLS has higher revenues than EPAC: FLS (4.32B) vs EPAC (597M).
EPACFLSEPAC / FLS
Capitalization1.93B5.99B32%
EBITDA128M374M34%
Gain YTD53.11945.575117%
P/E Ratio26.1032.3881%
Revenue597M4.32B14%
Total Cash154M546M28%
Total Debt245M1.41B17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EPAC vs FLS: Fundamental Ratings
EPAC
FLS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8593
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1550
SMR RATING
1..100
4559
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3940
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5827
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLS's Valuation (59) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as EPAC (78) in the null industry. This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to EPAC’s over the last 12 months.

EPAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLS (50) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that EPAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLS’s over the last 12 months.

EPAC's SMR Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as FLS (59) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that EPAC’s stock grew similarly to FLS’s over the last 12 months.

EPAC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as FLS (40) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that EPAC’s stock grew similarly to FLS’s over the last 12 months.

FLS's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as EPAC (58) in the null industry. This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to EPAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EPACFLS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EPAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EAGG46.840.02
+0.04%
iShares ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
DWCR29.36N/A
N/A
Arrow DWA Tactical International ETF
SXQG32.20N/A
N/A
ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF
BFOR75.63-0.74
-0.97%
Barron's 400 ETF
GSSC71.96-0.95
-1.30%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® US SmCp Eq ETF

EPAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPAC has been loosely correlated with FSS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EPAC jumps, then FSS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EPAC
1D Price
Change %
EPAC100%
-1.14%
FSS - EPAC
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.42%
NPO - EPAC
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.31%
FELE - EPAC
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
KMT - EPAC
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
FLS - EPAC
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
More

FLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLS has been closely correlated with FELE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLS jumps, then FELE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLS
1D Price
Change %
FLS100%
+0.07%
FELE - FLS
69%
Closely correlated
-0.57%
ITT - FLS
69%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
PH - FLS
67%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
EMR - FLS
66%
Closely correlated
-1.32%
FSS - FLS
66%
Closely correlated
-1.42%
More