Advertisement
EPAC vs FSS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EPAC is a StrongBuy and FSS is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EPAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFSS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- EPAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- FSS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EPAC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EPAC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- FSS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
EPAC (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -1.93% price change this week, while FSS (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +0.38% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.18%.
Reported Earning Dates
EPAC is expected to report earnings on Sep 24, 2025.
FSS is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Machinery (-1.30% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| EPAC | FSS | EPAC / FSS | |
| Capitalization | 1.93B | 5.2B | 37% |
| EBITDA | 128M | 283M | 45% |
| Gain YTD | 2.628 | 8.209 | 32% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.10 | 33.27 | 78% |
| Revenue | 597M | 1.72B | 35% |
| Total Cash | 154M | 61M | 252% |
| Total Debt | 245M | 321M | 76% |
EPAC | FSS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 32 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 14 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 39 | 47 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 51 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EPAC's Valuation (74) in the null industry is in the same range as FSS (82) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that EPAC’s stock grew similarly to FSS’s over the last 12 months.
FSS's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as EPAC (20) in the null industry. This means that FSS’s stock grew similarly to EPAC’s over the last 12 months.
EPAC's SMR Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as FSS (47) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that EPAC’s stock grew similarly to FSS’s over the last 12 months.
FSS's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as EPAC (61) in the null industry. This means that FSS’s stock grew similarly to EPAC’s over the last 12 months.
FSS's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as EPAC (63) in the null industry. This means that FSS’s stock grew similarly to EPAC’s over the last 12 months.
| EPAC | FSS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 49% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 47% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 67% | 5 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 18 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 53% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 60% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TMV | 39.58 | 1.15 | +2.99% |
| Direxion Daily 20+ Yr Trsy Bear 3X ETF | |||
| QDEC | 28.41 | -0.17 | -0.59% |
| FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – Dec | |||
| IWTR | 32.67 | -0.35 | -1.05% |
| iShares MSCI Water Mgmt Mltsctr ETF | |||
| AOA | 81.01 | -0.92 | -1.12% |
| iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allc ETF | |||
| HIDV | 71.22 | -0.96 | -1.34% |
| AB US High Dividend ETF | |||
EPAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPAC has been closely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EPAC jumps, then PH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EPAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPAC | 100% | -1.49% | ||
| PH - EPAC | 72% Closely correlated | -1.91% | ||
| ITT - EPAC | 71% Closely correlated | -1.11% | ||
| GRC - EPAC | 71% Closely correlated | -3.32% | ||
| GGG - EPAC | 71% Closely correlated | -1.87% | ||
| DCI - EPAC | 70% Closely correlated | -1.38% | ||
More | ||||
FSS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSS has been closely correlated with NPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSS jumps, then NPO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FSS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSS | 100% | +0.42% | ||
| NPO - FSS | 69% Closely correlated | -2.36% | ||
| ITT - FSS | 69% Closely correlated | -1.11% | ||
| FELE - FSS | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.98% | ||
| GRC - FSS | 66% Loosely correlated | -3.32% | ||
| EPAC - FSS | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.49% | ||
More | ||||