Enerpac Tool Group and Lincoln Electric Holdings both operate in the industrial machinery and equipment space, yet they serve it in very different ways. Enerpac specializes in high-pressure hydraulic tools, controlled-force products, and heavy-load positioning services, while Lincoln Electric is a global leader in welding, cutting, and brazing products. Because both companies are sensitive to manufacturing activity, capital spending, and reshoring trends, a side-by-side stock comparison offers a useful lens on the industrial sector. This analysis is most relevant to investors weighing a larger, dividend-growing industrial franchise against a smaller, turnaround-focused specialist with a different risk and return profile.
EPAC, Enerpac Tool Group Corp., designs and manufactures high-precision hydraulic and mechanical tools, controlled-force products, and heavy lifting solutions, serving mission-critical applications in more than 100 countries. In its most recent quarter, Enerpac reported solid organic growth in its product business, but its services segment continued to face pressure in the EMEA region, compounded by geopolitical disruptions in the Middle East. Against that backdrop, management narrowed its full-year fiscal 2026 guidance, trimming expectations for adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) and adjusted EPS (earnings per share). The company has also been returning capital through share repurchases under a $200 million authorization and announced an acquisition intended to broaden its addressable market. In recent weeks, the stock has traded below both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, reflecting cautious sentiment toward the services turnaround.
LECO, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc., is a leading manufacturer of welding, cutting, and brazing products across three segments: Americas Welding, International Welding, and The Harris Products Group. Its most recent quarterly results showed revenue rising roughly 12% year over year and earnings per share increasing by a similar magnitude, supported by strong consumables demand and growing automation interest in the Americas and Asia. Management has highlighted reshoring and automation as structural growth drivers under its long-term productivity strategy. Lincoln Electric also raised its quarterly dividend by 10%, continuing a multi-decade streak of annual increases. Like Enerpac, the shares have pulled back in recent weeks and sit below short-term moving averages, but they remain well within their broader 52-week trading range as investors weigh valuation against durable demand trends.
Tickeron maintains a large library of AI trading bots that collectively monitor thousands of tickers across different strategies, timeframes, and asset classes. Because market conditions change, only the most suitable strategies are elevated into the curated Trending AI Robots section, which highlights a focused selection — roughly two dozen featured bots drawn from a much larger universe of hundreds — along with transparency on realized returns, win rates, and profit factors. These bots vary considerably in style, from short-interval signal-based agents to multi-ticker swing strategies, so no two are identical in performance or risk. Readers interested in data-driven market screening can explore the page to compare bots by their trading statistics and the tickers they cover.
The most obvious contrast between these two names is scale and diversification. Lincoln Electric generates several billion dollars in annual revenue across a global welding portfolio, while Enerpac operates at a fraction of that size and is more concentrated in niche, high-margin hydraulic and heavy-lifting applications. Growth dynamics also diverge: Lincoln Electric is benefiting from automation adoption and reshoring tailwinds, whereas Enerpac is navigating a services-led soft patch alongside steady product growth.
From a shareholder-return perspective, Lincoln Electric emphasizes a growing dividend, while Enerpac leans on buybacks and M&A (mergers and acquisitions) to deploy capital. Valuation presents a trade-off: Lincoln Electric trades at a higher absolute price with a large market capitalization and a moderate forward P/E (price-to-earnings) multiple, while Enerpac's smaller size and lower liquidity contribute to a wider range of analyst price-target upside. On risk, Enerpac carries meaningful EMEA and Middle East exposure, while Lincoln Electric faces input-cost and tungsten price sensitivity. Sector-wide, both are exposed to the industrial cycle, though their product mixes and end markets differ materially.
Based on observable factors, Tickeron's AI would likely lean toward Lincoln Electric on trend consistency and fundamental momentum, given its stronger recent organic revenue growth, earnings expansion, and established dividend record. At the same time, the AI framework would note Enerpac's more compelling analyst price-target upside and its cleaner, lower-leverage balance sheet, which could support a more favorable risk/reward profile if its services business stabilizes. Because the two stocks occupy different positions along the risk spectrum, the AI's preference is best understood as conditional: Lincoln Electric currently exhibits more stable, broad-based momentum, while Enerpac represents a higher-upside, higher-uncertainty positioning that may appeal to investors with a longer time horizon.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
EPAC saw its Momentum Indicator move above the 0 level on October 21, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new upward move. Traders may want to consider buying the stock or buying call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 104 similar instances where the indicator turned positive. In 74 of the 104 cases, the stock moved higher in the following days. The odds of a move higher are at 71%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for EPAC just turned positive on October 16, 2026. Looking at past instances where EPAC's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 35 of 50 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.
Following a +1.16% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where EPAC advanced for three days, in 212 of 323 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 66%.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 39 of 59 cases where EPAC's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 66%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where EPAC declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 68%.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 45 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 53 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 74, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 57 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. EPAC’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 59 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.305) is normal, around the industry mean (3.949). P/E Ratio (20.056) is within average values for comparable stocks, (39.002). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.344) is also within normal values, averaging (1.879). Dividend Yield (0.004) settles around the average of (0.030) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.983) is also within normal values, averaging (186.943).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 65 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
Moving lower for three straight days is viewed as a bearish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future declines. Considering data from situations where LECO declined for three days, in 168 of 292 cases, the price declined further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 58%.
The 10-day RSI Indicator for LECO moved out of overbought territory on October 28, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 37 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 18 of the 37 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 49%.
The Stochastic Oscillator entered the overbought zone. Expect a price pull-back in the foreseeable future.
LECO broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 27, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 27, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on LECO as a result. In 55 of 82 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for LECO just turned positive on October 27, 2026. Looking at past instances where LECO's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 26 of 43 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.
LECO moved above its 50-day moving average on October 27, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +10.32% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where LECO advanced for three days, in 220 of 346 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 171 of 305 cases where LECO Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 56%.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 22 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 68, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 27 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 33 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 44 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. LECO’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 88 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: LECO's P/B Ratio (9.973) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (3.204). P/E Ratio (28.182) is within average values for comparable stocks, (22.513). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.531) is also within normal values, averaging (1.020). Dividend Yield (0.011) settles around the average of (0.017) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.155) is also within normal values, averaging (2.217).
EPAC | LECO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 44 | 88 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 22 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | 27 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 33 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EPAC's Valuation (59) in the null industry is in the same range as LECO (88) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that EPAC’s stock grew similarly to LECO’s over the last 12 months.
LECO's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as EPAC (53) in the null industry. This means that LECO’s stock grew similarly to EPAC’s over the last 12 months.
LECO's SMR Rating (27) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as EPAC (45) in the null industry. This means that LECO’s stock grew similarly to EPAC’s over the last 12 months.
LECO's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as EPAC (57) in the null industry. This means that LECO’s stock grew similarly to EPAC’s over the last 12 months.
LECO's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as EPAC (65) in the null industry. This means that LECO’s stock grew similarly to EPAC’s over the last 12 months.
| EPAC | LECO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 49% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 68% | 7 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 43% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 56% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EPAC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while LECO’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EPAC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LECO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
EPAC (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +10.64% price change this week, while LECO (@Tools & Hardware) price change was +10.65% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +2.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.94%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tools & Hardware industry was +3.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.21%.
EPAC is expected to report earnings on Dec 16, 2026.
LECO is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2027.
The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
@Tools & Hardware (+3.85% weekly)Tools & Hardware industry includes companies that manufacture security products, storage cabinets, steel rules and tapes, calipers, shoe hook fasteners, lumber, structural materials and other related supplies. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Snap-on Incorporated and L.S. Starrett Company are some of the largest, established players in this industry. The industry is also seeing rapid growth in online sales. The proliferation of do-it-yourself (DIY) projects has boosted industry demand. But oil price volatility poses potential risks to this industry, particularly to e-commerce companies which spend on services of shipping companies, which might alter charges based on oil price movements.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPAC has been loosely correlated with LECO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EPAC jumps, then LECO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EPAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPAC | 100% | +0.96% | ||
| LECO - EPAC | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| RBC - EPAC | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| ATMU - EPAC | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| SNA - EPAC | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| HLMN - EPAC | 55% Loosely correlated | +3.97% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LECO has been closely correlated with GGG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LECO jumps, then GGG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LECO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LECO | 100% | -0.63% | ||
| GGG - LECO | 74% Closely correlated | +1.05% | ||
| DOV - LECO | 73% Closely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| DCI - LECO | 73% Closely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| ZWS - LECO | 70% Closely correlated | -11.50% | ||
| FELE - LECO | 70% Closely correlated | -1.45% | ||
More | ||||