EPAC
Price
$42.40
Change
-$0.29 (-0.68%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.29B
15 days until earnings call
UMICF
Price
$15.10
Change
-$0.15 (-0.98%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.75B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EPAC vs UMICF

Header iconEPAC vs UMICF Comparison
Open Charts EPAC vs UMICFBanner chart's image
Enerpac Tool Group
Price$42.40
Change-$0.29 (-0.68%)
Volume$5.73K
Capitalization2.29B
Umicore SA
Price$15.10
Change-$0.15 (-0.98%)
Volume$15
Capitalization3.75B
EPAC vs UMICF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EPAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UMICF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EPAC vs. UMICF commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EPAC is a Hold and UMICF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (EPAC: $42.43 vs. UMICF: $15.10)
Brand notoriety: EPAC and UMICF are both not notable
EPAC represents the Industrial Machinery, while UMICF is part of the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EPAC: 85% vs. UMICF: 4%
Market capitalization -- EPAC: $2.29B vs. UMICF: $3.75B
EPAC [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $2.29B. UMICF’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $3.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $207.36B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $88.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $13.79B. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EPAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUMICF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EPAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UMICF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EPAC is a better buy in the long-term than UMICF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EPAC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMICF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EPAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UMICF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EPAC is a better buy in the short-term than UMICF.

Price Growth

EPAC (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +0.21% price change this week, while UMICF (@Environmental Services) price change was -1.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.64%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

EPAC is expected to report earnings on Sep 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (+0.48% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

@Environmental Services (-0.04% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UMICF($3.75B) has a higher market cap than EPAC($2.29B). EPAC (26.35) and UMICF (26.30) have similar P/E ratio . UMICF YTD gains are higher at: 50.025 vs. EPAC (3.261). UMICF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 389M vs. EPAC (135M). UMICF has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. EPAC (141M). EPAC has less debt than UMICF: EPAC (191M) vs UMICF (2.87B). UMICF has higher revenues than EPAC: UMICF (16.1B) vs EPAC (608M).
EPACUMICFEPAC / UMICF
Capitalization2.29B3.75B61%
EBITDA135M389M35%
Gain YTD3.26150.0257%
P/E Ratio26.3526.30100%
Revenue608M16.1B4%
Total Cash141M1.11B13%
Total Debt191M2.87B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EPAC vs UMICF: Fundamental Ratings
EPAC
UMICF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6583
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
32100
SMR RATING
1..100
4295
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5641
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5154
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UMICF's Valuation (52) in the null industry is in the same range as EPAC (72). This means that UMICF’s stock grew similarly to EPAC’s over the last 12 months.

EPAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for UMICF (100). This means that EPAC’s stock grew significantly faster than UMICF’s over the last 12 months.

EPAC's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UMICF (95). This means that EPAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than UMICF’s over the last 12 months.

UMICF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as EPAC (56). This means that UMICF’s stock grew similarly to EPAC’s over the last 12 months.

EPAC's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as UMICF (54). This means that EPAC’s stock grew similarly to UMICF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EPACUMICF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EPAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UMICF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SLVIX39.73N/A
N/A
Columbia Select Large Cap Value Inst2
MGOSX14.93N/A
N/A
Victory Munder Mid-Cap Core Growth R6
TRMIX33.25N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value I
ARYGX13.70N/A
N/A
American Century Global Real Estate R5
WLIVX19.06N/A
N/A
WCM Focused International Equity Inv

EPAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPAC has been closely correlated with FELE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EPAC jumps, then FELE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EPAC
1D Price
Change %
EPAC100%
-0.61%
FELE - EPAC
69%
Closely correlated
+0.01%
PH - EPAC
69%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
GGG - EPAC
67%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
ITT - EPAC
67%
Closely correlated
+1.28%
DOV - EPAC
67%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
More

UMICF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMICF has been loosely correlated with UMICY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UMICF jumps, then UMICY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UMICF
1D Price
Change %
UMICF100%
N/A
UMICY - UMICF
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.04%
SMNEY - UMICF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.76%
SKFRY - UMICF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
EPAC - UMICF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
FANUY - UMICF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.11%
More