EPAM
Price
$176.45
Change
+$2.27 (+1.30%)
Updated
Aug 29, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.82B
62 days until earnings call
FLYW
Price
$13.14
Change
-$0.01 (-0.08%)
Updated
Aug 29, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.61B
74 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EPAM vs FLYW

Header iconEPAM vs FLYW Comparison
Open Charts EPAM vs FLYWBanner chart's image
Epam Systems
Price$176.45
Change+$2.27 (+1.30%)
Volume$4.34K
Capitalization9.82B
Flywire
Price$13.14
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
Volume$17.86K
Capitalization1.61B
EPAM vs FLYW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EPAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLYW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EPAM vs. FLYW commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EPAM is a StrongBuy and FLYW is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (EPAM: $174.18 vs. FLYW: $13.16)
Brand notoriety: EPAM and FLYW are both not notable
EPAM represents the Information Technology Services, while FLYW is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EPAM: 154% vs. FLYW: 54%
Market capitalization -- EPAM: $9.7B vs. FLYW: $1.61B
EPAM [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $9.7B. FLYW’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $1.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $228.9B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.79T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $10.33B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EPAM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFLYW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EPAM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FLYW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLYW is a better buy in the long-term than EPAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EPAM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLYW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EPAM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FLYW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both EPAM and FLYW are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

EPAM (@Information Technology Services) experienced а +4.68% price change this week, while FLYW (@Computer Communications) price change was +7.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.92%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

EPAM is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

FLYW is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (-0.56% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

@Computer Communications (-0.40% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EPAM($9.82B) has a higher market cap than FLYW($1.61B). FLYW has higher P/E ratio than EPAM: FLYW (263.00) vs EPAM (25.16). EPAM YTD gains are higher at: -25.507 vs. FLYW (-36.178). EPAM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 688M vs. FLYW (28.8M). EPAM has more cash in the bank: 1.04B vs. FLYW (274M). FLYW has less debt than EPAM: FLYW (61.4M) vs EPAM (163M). EPAM has higher revenues than FLYW: EPAM (5.07B) vs FLYW (540M).
EPAMFLYWEPAM / FLYW
Capitalization9.82B1.61B611%
EBITDA688M28.8M2,389%
Gain YTD-25.507-36.17871%
P/E Ratio25.16263.0010%
Revenue5.07B540M939%
Total Cash1.04B274M380%
Total Debt163M61.4M265%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EPAM: Fundamental Ratings
EPAM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
74
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EPAMFLYW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EPAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLYW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VINIX527.74N/A
N/A
Vanguard Institutional Index I
MFWBX18.49N/A
N/A
MFS Global Total Return B
FUMIX19.09N/A
N/A
Fidelity SAI US Momentum Index
KMDIX32.17N/A
N/A
Keeley Gabelli Mid Cap Dividend I
GLEPX13.83N/A
N/A
GS Energy Infrastructure Fd Instl Shares

EPAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPAM has been closely correlated with CTSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EPAM jumps, then CTSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EPAM
1D Price
Change %
EPAM100%
+0.36%
CTSH - EPAM
67%
Closely correlated
-0.82%
KD - EPAM
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
ACN - EPAM
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
DXC - EPAM
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
GDYN - EPAM
60%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

FLYW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLYW has been loosely correlated with GLOB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLYW jumps, then GLOB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLYW
1D Price
Change %
FLYW100%
+0.69%
GLOB - FLYW
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
ACN - FLYW
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
CLVT - FLYW
61%
Loosely correlated
-3.79%
AVDX - FLYW
60%
Loosely correlated
N/A
EPAM - FLYW
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
More